Abstract:Corporate venture capital(CVC) investments are direct or indirect minority equity investment made by established firms(corporate investors) in external privately held entrepreneurial ventures(portfolio companies).CVC investments are recognized as a source of firm value,which may relate to their attractiveness as multi-choice platforms from which to pursue strategic benefits.Accordingly,growing attention has been given in the academic literature to CVC activities in USA,sometimes as a distinct dimension of corporate entrepreneurship.The literature has so far focused on either the standalone,individual effect of CVC investments or the impact of total amount of CVC investments on corporate investors' performance.An important but as yet unexplored question is the relationship of the industry diversification profile of the portfolio of venture companies to corporate value creation.Furthermore,the programs structure,investments channels,investments models and practices of CVC activities between USA and China has significant differences.The conclusions derive of America does not necessarily fit China's CVC activities.However,partly because China does not have related databases,which is essential to researchers,China scholars hardly take the final investee,the entrepreneurial ventures into consideration.This is an important gap in the literature.In this paper,we take all three parties involving CVC activities(corporate investors,CVC program,and the entrepreneurial enterprises) into the whole framework and invoke a multiple real options theory framework to investigate this topic,focusing on CVC portfolio diversification and its influence on corporate investor value creation and the moderating effects of organizational slack on their relationship.Our empirical analysis dataset is based on evaluating the firm value created by listed companies in the Shanghai and Shenzhen motherboards corporate investors between 2000 and 2012 which includes 77 firms and 670 firmyear observations.We used generalized unbalanced panel-data linear regression fixed effects and random effects models to examine the relationships between a corporate investor's value(measured by Tobin's Q) and its CVC portfolio diversification(measured by the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index,HHI) as well as the potential moderating effects of the corporate investor's organizational slack(measured by half the sum of current ratios and debt-to-equity).Empirical results shows that,the diversification of a corporate investor's portfolio of venture companies is related to corporate value creation in a U-shaped relationship and the U-shaped relationship is positively moderated by the corporate investor's organizational slack.The finding of the U-shaped relationship not only contributes to the understanding of strategic benefits of CVC activity at the portfolio level,but also advances the knowledge regarding the impact of diversification on performance.In addition,we find that a corporate investor's organizational slack positively moderate the U-shaped relationship.The findings from our results may have significant practical implications to CVC investment decisions as well as prompting strategic managers who are considering future CVC investments to take into account the impact of organizational slack in a positive way.More specifically,our findings may help to shape the pattern of how CVC programs invest and suggest that incumbents need to be mindful of their diversification strategy at the same time maintain appropriate available slack and potential slack.

A Dark Side of Corporate Venture Capital

Do Venture Capitalists Play A Monitoring Role in an Emerging Market? Evidence from the Pay-Performance Relationship of Chinese Entrepreneurial Firms

Corporate Philanthropy and Tunneling: Evidence from China

Monitoring or Colluding: the Role of Venture Capital Investors in the IPO Process

Corporate Venture Capital Portfolio Diversification and Firm Value: The Moderating Effect of Organizational Slack

Corporate Venture Capital and Firm Technology Innovation: the Moderating Effect of Absorptive Capacity, Involvement Intensity and CVC Program Government Structure

CVC Involvement, Digital Transformation, and Risk-Taking of Investee Companies: Evidence from China

The Effect of Venture Capital on Invested Firms’ Social Responsibility: Evidence from Venture Capital’s Exits

Firm Structure and Environment as Contingencies to the Corporate Venture Capital-Parent Firm Value Relationship

Past performance and corporate venture capital:The moderating effect of top management's political networking

The courage to venture: Revealing the effect of social trust on corporate venture capital

Do venture capital firms promote corporate social responsibility?

Corporate Venture Capital, Value Creation, and Innovation

Disciplining Delegated Monitors: Evidence from Venture Capital

Venture capital activities under uncertainty: US and UK investors behavior

Did Government Venture Capital Fund Innovative but Less Profitable Companies? Evidence from China

An Empirical Study on the Benefit and Influential Factors of Listed Companies Participating in Corporate Venture Capital

Do Better-Networked Venture Capital Firms Always Enjoy Higher Investment Performance? the Contingent Role of China’s Institutional Changes

The Willingness of PVCs to Invest GVCs Backed Ventures: the Role of Institutional Logics

Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard of Venture Capitalist As Agent and the Design of Financing Contract

The Effects of Government Venture Capital: New Evidence from China Based on a Two-Sided Matching Structural Model