Abstract:Context: In this article, we draw upon diverse and contextually different experiences of working on inclusive assessment, with the aim of bridging and enhancing practices of inclusive assessments for health professions education (HPE) within universities. Instead of juxtaposing our views from three countries, we combine our perspectives to advocate for inclusive assessment. Discussion: Creating an inclusive assessment culture is important for equitable education, even if priorities for inclusion might differ between contexts. We recognise challenges in the enactment of inclusive assessment, namely, the notion of lowering standards, harming reliability and robustness of assessment design and inclusion as a poorly defined and catchall term. Importantly, the lack of awareness that inclusion means recognising intersectionality is a barrier for well-designed inclusive assessments. This is why we offer considerations for HPE practitioners that can guide towards a unified direction of travel for inclusive assessments. This article highlights the importance of contextual prioritisation and initiatives to be considered at the global level to national, institutional, programme and the individual level. Utilising experience and literature from undergraduate, higher education contexts, we offer considerations with applicability across the assessment continuum. Context: In this state of science paper, we were set the challenge of providing cross-cultural viewpoints on inclusive assessment. In this discursive article, we focus on inclusive assessment within undergraduate health professions education whilst looking to the wider higher education literature, since institutional policies and procedures frequently drive assessment decisions and influence the environment in which they occur. We explore our experiences of working in inclusive assessment, with the aim of bridging and enhancing practices of inclusive assessments for HPE. Unlike other articles that juxtapose views, we all come from the perspective of supporting inclusive assessment. We begin with a discussion on what inclusive assessment is and then describe our contexts as a basis for understanding differences and broadening conversations. We work in the United Kingdom, Australia and Malaysia, having undertaken research, facilitated workshops and seminars on inclusive assessment nationally and internationally. We recognise our perspectives will differ as a consequence of our global context, institutional culture, individual characteristics and educational experiences. (Note that individual characteristics are also known as protected characteristics in some countries). Then, we outline challenges and opportunities associated with inclusive assessment, drawing on evidence within our contexts, acknowledging that our understanding of inclusive assessment research is limited to publications in English and currently tilted to publications from the Global North. In the final section, we then offer recommendations for championing inclusion, focussing firstly on assessment designs, and then broader considerations to organise collective action. Our article is unapologetically practical; the deliberate divergence from a theoretical piece is with the intent that anyone who reads this paper might enact even one small change progressing towards more inclusive assessment practices within their context.

Governance models for collaborations involving assessment

The Rationale for and Use of Assessment Frameworks: Improving Assessment and Reporting Quality in Medical Education

Developing Outcomes Assessments For Collaborative, Cross-Institutional Benchmarking: Progress Of The Australian Medical Assessment Collaboration

Clinical reasoning performance assessment: using situated cognition theory as a conceptual framework

Assessing Student Engagement and Outcomes: Modelling Insights from Australia and Around the World

The Australian medical assessment collaboration: Developing the foundations for a national assessment of medical student learning outcomes

Assessment, feedback and the alchemy of learning

Linking Assessment for Learning, Improvement and Accountability

Design and Implementation of a National Program of Assessment Model – Integrating Entrustable Professional Activity Assessments in Canadian Specialist Postgraduate Medical Education

What we measure … and what we should measure in medical education

The Governance, Policy and Strategy of Learning Outcomes Assessment in Higher Education

Assessment moderation in higher education: Guiding practice with evidence-an integrative review

The Next Era of Assessment Within Medical Education: Exploring Intersections of Context and Implementation

Assessing Student Learning Outcomes Internationally: Insights and Frontiers

Authentic assessment in medical education: exploring AI integration and student-as-partners collaboration

Inclusive assessment in health professions education: Balancing global goals and local contexts

Building blocks for social accountability: a conceptual framework to guide medical schools

Beyond the grade: the planning, formative and summative (PFS) model of self-assessment for higher education

Educators as Judges: Applying Judicial Decision-Making Principles to High-Stakes Education Assessment Decisions

The role of governance in Indigenous medical education research

High-Stakes Collaborative Testing: Why Not?