A Comparative Study of the Relationship between the Subjective Difficulty, Objective Difficulty of Search Tasks and Search Behaviors

Kun Huang,Jiaqi Chen,Chang Liu,Lulu Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3383583.3398614
2020-01-01
Abstract:This study uses comparative research to compare the effects of the subjective difficulty and objective difficulty of search tasks on users' search behaviors. Data regarding users' opinions about task difficulty was obtained via a post-search questionnaire using a 5-Likert scale. When measuring subjective difficulty, tasks with ratings above 3 were considered difficult. When measuring objective difficulty, tasks with ratings higher than the average difficulty score were considered difficult. The study's findings indicate that it is better to develop task difficulty prediction models that are based on subjective difficulty because these models are more stable. Models based on objective difficulty could not match the performance of models based upon subjective difficulty. The findings shed light on issues related to experiment design that will be valuable for future research.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?