Object Oriented Software Metrics Technology

Tao Xie,Huang Huang,Xiangkui Chen,Hong Mei,Fuqing Yang

1999-01-01

Abstract:1.1 The Need for Software Metrics 1.2 Definition of Software Metrics 1.3 Classification of Software Metrics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Object Oriented Software Quality Evaluation Technology

Tao Xie,Huang Huang,Xiangkui Chen,Hong Mei,Fuqing Yang

2000-01-01

Abstract:1.1 The Need for Software Metrics 1.2 Definition of Software Metrics 1.3 Classification and Activities of Software Metrics
A model-based approach to object-oriented software metrics

Hong Mei,Tao Xie,Fuqing Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02960766

IF: 1.871

2002-01-01

Journal of Computer Science and Technology

Abstract:The need to improve software productivity and software quality has put forward the research on software metrics technology and the development of software metrics tool to support related activities. To support object-oriented software metrics practice effectively, a model-based approach to object-oriented software metrics is proposed in this paper. This approach guides the metrics users to adopt the quality metrics model to measure the object-oriented software products. The development of the model can be achieved by using a top-down approach. This approach explicitly proposes the conception of absolute normalization computation and relative normalization computation for a metrics model. Moreover, a generic software metrics tool—Jade Bird Object-Oriented Metrics Tool (JBOOMT) is designed to implement this approach. The parser-based approach adopted by the tool makes the information of the source program accurate and complete for measurement. It supports various customizable hierarchical metrics models and provides a flexible user interface for users to manipulate the models. It also supports absolute and relative normalization mechanisms in different situations.
Software Metrics Evaluation Based on Entropy

R. Selvarani,T. R. Gopalakrishnan Nair,Muthu Ramachandran,Kamakshi Prasad,R.Selvarani,T.R.Gopalakrishnan Nair

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1001.3473

2010-01-20

Software Engineering

Abstract:Software engineering activities in the Industry has come a long way with various improve- ments brought in various stages of the software development life cycle. The complexity of modern software, the commercial constraints and the expectation for high quality products demand the accurate fault prediction based on OO design metrics in the class level in the early stages of software development. The object oriented class metrics are used as quality predictors in the entire OO software development life cycle even when a highly iterative, incremental model or agile software process is employed. Recent research has shown some of the OO design metrics are useful for predicting fault-proneness of classes. In this paper the empirical validation of a set of metrics proposed by Chidamber and Kemerer is performed to assess their ability in predicting the software quality in terms of fault proneness and degradation. We have also proposed the design complexity of object-oriented software with Weighted Methods per Class metric (WMC-CK metric) expressed in terms of Shannon entropy, and error proneness.
Jboomt: Jade Bird Object-Oriented Metrics Tool

T Xie,WH Yuan,H Mei,FQ Yang

IF: 1.019

2000-01-01

Chinese Journal of Electronics

Abstract:Focusing on software productivity and software quality control has spurred the research on software metrics technology. The increasing importance being placed on object-oriented software development has led to the research on the object-oriented software metrics and the development of automated tools to support object-oriented metrics. To effectively aid the software evaluation, a software metrics tool is supposed to support the metrics model. The objective of Jade Bird object-oriented metrics tool (JBOOMT) is to provide an automated software metrics support for users and managers to measure the design or source code of the object-oriented program acid thus evaluate the quality of the software according to the specified hierarchical metrics model. A mechanism is provided for metrics users to customize the preferred metrics model and browse the details of the metrics model. This article introduces the design of JBOOMT and discusses its implementation built in the Jade Bird program analysis system (JBPAS).
Measuring the Contributions of (O)RDBMS to Object-Oriented Software Development

WP Zhang,N Ritter

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ideas.2000.880583

2000-01-01

Abstract:We describe a new benchmark approach which is needed for two reasons. First, today's computer systems almost exclusively use relational database management systems (DBMS), and, besides (purely) relational DB technology, only the new trend of object-relational technology is expected to obtain practical relevance. Second, today's (complex) software systems are developed in an object-oriented way. Thus, a benchmark approach is needed assessing the contributions of (object-)relational DBMS to object-oriented software development. Consequently, such a benchmark does not only have to 'measure' the efficiency of the DBMS itself but does also have to take the overhead to be spent for mapping object-oriented data structures to the DBMS interface into account. We describe how our approach achieves this goal and report on first measurement results.
Assessment of maintainability metrics for object-oriented software system

Sanjay Kumar Dubey,Ajay Rana

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2020976.2020983

2011-09-30

ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes

Abstract:Many organizations assess the maintainability of software systems before they are deployed. Object-oriented design has been shown to be a useful technique to develop and deliver quality software. Objectoriented metrics can be used to assess the maintainability of a software system. Various software metrics and models have been developed and described. This paper provides a review of this literature and the related state-of-the-art. It also proposes a maintainability model that is based on the analysis of the relationship between object-oriented metrics and maintainability.
A Metrics-Based Comparative Study on Object-Oriented Programming Languages.

Di Wu,Lin Chen,Yuming Zhou,Baowen Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18293/seke2015-64

2015-01-01

Abstract:There has been a long debate on which programming language can help write better object-oriented programs.However, to date little response is given to this issue with empirical evidence.In this paper, we perform a comparative study on C++, C#, and Java programs by using object-oriented metrics, which comprise measures for class size, complexity, coupling, cohesion, inheritance, encapsulation, polymorphism, and reusability.Our experiment is conducted on 78 tasks in Rosetta Code, a code repository providing solutions to the same programming tasks in different languages.The experimental results show that: (1) C++ classes are significantly larger than C# and Java classes in size, but their complexity does not differ significantly; (2) C# classes are significantly more likely to be coupled than C++ and Java classes through inter-class method invocations instead of direct data access; (3) C# and Java classes tend to be more cohesive than C++ classes; (4) C# and Java significantly outperform C++ in building deep inheritance trees; and (5) programs written in C++, C#, and Java do not show a significant difference in class encapsulation, polymorphism, and reusability.These findings could help practitioners choose suitable languages to develop object-oriented systems.
Design and Implementation of Pgrmetrics:A Software Complexity Measurement System

丁炎炎,赵洋,蔡志旻,潘金贵

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-3695.2004.01.055

2004-01-01

Abstract:In this paper, we propose a source code metrics system that base on the Extended Program Object Model (EPOM). By avoiding extract information from the source file directly, we make the system more concise and easy to implement.
Evaluation of Software Product Quality Metrics

Arthur-Jozsef Molnar,Alexandra Neamţu,Simona Motogna

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40223-5_8

2020-09-03

Abstract:Computing devices and associated software govern everyday life, and form the backbone of safety critical systems in banking, healthcare, automotive and other fields. Increasing system complexity, quickly evolving technologies and paradigm shifts have kept software quality research at the forefront. Standards such as ISO's 25010 express it in terms of sub-characteristics such as maintainability, reliability and security. A significant body of literature attempts to link these subcharacteristics with software metric values, with the end goal of creating a metric-based model of software product quality. However, research also identifies the most important existing barriers. Among them we mention the diversity of software application types, development platforms and languages. Additionally, unified definitions to make software metrics truly language-agnostic do not exist, and would be difficult to implement given programming language levels of variety. This is compounded by the fact that many existing studies do not detail their methodology and tooling, which precludes researchers from creating surveys to enable data analysis on a larger scale. In our paper, we propose a comprehensive study of metric values in the context of three complex, open-source applications. We align our methodology and tooling with that of existing research, and present it in detail in order to facilitate comparative evaluation. We study metric values during the entire 18-year development history of our target applications, in order to capture the longitudinal view that we found lacking in existing literature. We identify metric dependencies and check their consistency across applications and their versions. At each step, we carry out comparative evaluation with existing research and present our results.

Software Engineering
Design Level Metrics to Measure the Complexity Across Versions of AO Software

Parthipan S,Senthil Velan S,Chitra Babu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCCT.2014.7019400

2020-12-01

Abstract:Software metric plays a vital role in quantitative assessment of any specific software development methodology and its impact on the maintenance of software. It can also be used to indicate the degree of interdependence among the components by providing valuable feedback about quality attributes such as maintainability, modifiability and understandability. The effort for software maintenance normally has a high correlation with the complexity of its design. Aspect Oriented Software Design is an emerging methodology that provides powerful new techniques to improve the modularity of software from its design. In this paper, evaluation model to capture the symptoms of complexity has been defined consisting of metrics, artifacts and elements of complexity. A tool to automatically capture these metrics across different versions of a case study application, University Automation System has been developed. The values obtained for the proposed metrics are used to infer on the complexity of Java and AspectJ implementations of the case study application. These measurements indicate that AspectJ implementations are less complex compared to the Java implementations and there by positively influencing the maintainability of software.

Software Engineering
Software Code Quality Measurement: Implications from Metric Distributions

Siyuan Jin,Mianmian Zhang,Yekai Guo,Yuejiang He,Ziyuan Li,Bichao Chen,Bing Zhu,Yong Xia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS60937.2023.00054

2024-01-16

Abstract:Software code quality is a construct with three dimensions: maintainability, reliability, and functionality. Although many firms have incorporated code quality metrics in their operations, evaluating these metrics still lacks consistent standards. We categorized distinct metrics into two types: 1) monotonic metrics that consistently influence code quality; and 2) non-monotonic metrics that lack a consistent relationship with code quality. To consistently evaluate them, we proposed a distribution-based method to get metric scores. Our empirical analysis includes 36,460 high-quality open-source software (OSS) repositories and their raw metrics from SonarQube and CK. The evaluated scores demonstrate great explainability on software adoption. Our work contributes to the multi-dimensional construct of code quality and its metric measurements, which provides practical implications for consistent measurements on both monotonic and non-monotonic metrics.

Software Engineering
The Impact of the Object-Oriented Software Evolution on Software Metrics: The Iris Approach

Ra'Fat Al-Msie'deen,Anas H. Blasi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2018/v11i8/121148

2018-03-15

Abstract:The Object-Oriented (OO) software system evolves over the time to meet the new requirements. Based on the initial release of software, the continuous modification of software code leads to software evolution. Software needs to evolve over the time to meet the new user's requirements. Software companies often develop variant software of the original one depends on customers' needs. The main hypothesis of this paper states that the software when it evolves over the time, its code continues to grow, change and become more complex. This paper proposes an automatic approach (Iris) to examine the proposed hypothesis. Originality of this approach is the exploiting of the software variants to study the impact of software evolution on the software metrics. This paper presents the results of experiments conducted on three releases of drawing shapes software, sixteen releases of rhino software, eight releases of mobile media software and ten releases of ArgoUML software. Based on the extracted software metrics, It has been found that Iris hypothesis is supported by the computed metrics.

Software Engineering
Teaching Software Metrology: The Science of Measurement for Software Engineering

Paul Ralph,Miikka Kuutila,Hera Arif,Bimpe Ayoola

2024-06-21

Abstract:While the methodological rigor of computing research has improved considerably in the past two decades, quantitative software engineering research is hampered by immature measures and inattention to theory. Measurement-the principled assignment of numbers to phenomena-is intrinsically difficult because observation is predicated upon not only theoretical concepts but also the values and perspective of the research. Despite several previous attempts to raise awareness of more sophisticated approaches to measurement and the importance of quantitatively assessing reliability and validity, measurement issues continue to be widely ignored. The reasons are unknown, but differences in typical engineering and computer science graduate training programs (compared to psychology and management, for example) are involved. This chapter therefore reviews key concepts in the science of measurement and applies them to software engineering research. A series of exercises for applying important measurement concepts to the reader's research are included, and a sample dataset for the reader to try some of the statistical procedures mentioned is provided.

Software Engineering
Investigating Software Testability and Test cases Effectiveness

Mamdouh Alenezi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.10090

2022-01-25

Software Engineering

Abstract:Software measurement is an essential management tool to develop robust and maintainable software systems. Software metrics can be used to control the inherent complexities in software design. To guarantee that the components of the software are inevitably testable, the testability attribute is used, which is a sub-characteristics of the software's maintabilility as well as quality assurance. This study investigates the relationship between static code and test metrics and testability and test cases effectiveness. The study answers three formulated research questions. The results of the analysis showed that size and complexity metrics are suitable for predicting the testability of object-oriented classes.
Metrics for Large-scale Software Systems Based on Complex Networks

WANG Shu-sen,GU Qing,CHEN Tao,CHEN Dao-xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-137X.2009.02.070

2009-01-01

Computer Science

Abstract:With the aggrandizement scale of software systems,how to measure the complexity of large-scale object-oriented software systems has been a challenge for software engineers.The theory of complex networks recently studied has offered a new perspective on solving this problem.We studied the phenomenon of complex networks in large-scale software system,and proposed metrics from three different levels,i.e.,unit-level,module-level and network-level.We built JPAC,a tool for characterizing and measuring the complexity of Java systems.JPAC can be used to analyze the structure of large-scale Java systems,and compute software metrics based on complex networks.
A Flexible Metric-Driven Framework for Software Process

Cheng Lin,Zhongdong Huang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/NCM.2009.189

2009-01-01

Abstract:In software engineering, metrics are always used for measuring the quality of software process to improve software development or maintenance. In fact, there are several metric frameworks available to make metrics work efficiently, but only for the specific industrial region. In this paper, a general metrics framework is proposed, which is following the Goal/Question/Metric paradigm of Basili and Weiss (1984), to support most of the metrics. Furthermore, a sample application based on this framework is presented to demonstrate its effect on software process. The results provide some useful insights into project management practices. Finally, some enhancements are proposed for future work.
A MOF-Based Framework for Defining Metrics to Measure the Quality of Models.

Tao Yue,Shaukat Ali

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09195-2_14

2014-01-01

Abstract:Controlled experiments in model-based software engineering, especially those involving human subjects performing modeling tasks, often require comparing models produced by experiment subjects with reference models, which are considered to be correct and complete. The purpose of such comparison is to assess the quality of models produced by experiment subjects so that experiment hypotheses can be accepted or rejected. The quality of models is typically measured quantitatively based on metrics. Manually defining such metrics for a rich modeling language is often cumbersome and error-prone. It can also result in metrics that do not systematically consider relevant details and in turn may produce biased results. In this paper, we present a framework to automatically generate quality metrics for MOF-based metamodels, which in turn can be used to measure the quality of models (instances of the MOF-based metamodels). This framework was evaluated by comparing its results with manually derived quality metrics for UML class and sequence diagrams and it has been used to derive metrics for measuring the quality of UML state machine diagrams. Results show that it is more efficient and systematic to define quality metrics with the framework than doing it manually.
Research on Layered Quality Metrics Model for Java Programme

黄璜,周欣,孙家骕

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-137X.2003.05.025

2003-01-01

Computer Science

Abstract:Metrics model is in fact a cluster of criterions to assess software, which may show the characteristics ofdifferent software systems or modules and then serve different demands from users. The research on software metricstries to give characteristic evaluations to software components in component extraction, and then supports users to se-lect reusable components in high quality.Java has been one of the main languages today. With consideration of characteristics of Java and research on somegeneral metrics model, our model: Quality Metrics Model for Java is born.Following the principle of "Factor-Criterion-Metrics", more detailed descriptions of factors, criterions and met-rics of our model are given. In fact, the metrics model shows us some way for consideration. Through this model, wehope to normalize the point of the views of users.In JavaSQMM, four activities organize software quality evaluating: understanding, function implementing,maintaining and reusing, and then four corresponding factors of quality come to birth, which are mixed by criteria andmetrics.When designing our Java metrics model, the original development of Object Oriented Metrics Model Tool for Ja-va(OOMTJava)provides the support to process of metrics semi-automatically.
Toward Software Measurement and Quality Analysis of MARF and GIPSY Case Studies a Team 13 SOEN6611-S14 Project Report

Abdulrhman Albeladi,Rabe Abdalkareem,Farhat Agwaeten,Khalid Altoum,Youssef Bennis,Zakaria Nasereldine

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1407.0063

2014-06-30

Software Engineering

Abstract:It is no longer a debate that quality is an essential requirement in any software product, especially in a highly competitive market and a context of mission critical product. To obtain better product quality, software metrics are the only reliable indicators provided to assess and measure this attribute of a software product. Several metrics have been elaborated but none of them were really convenient in an object oriented ecosystem. However, the MOOD metrics have proven their efficiency in gauging the software quality at system level, while CK Metrics measure the quality of software at class level . These metrics, well suited for Object-Oriented design, allow measuring object oriented design properties such as coupling, cohesion, encapsulation, Inheritance and polymorphism. The goal of the present study is using the mentioned metrics to assess the quality of two different case studies, MARF and GIPSY. For this purpose, different tools such as McCabe, Logiscope and, JDeodorant have been used to measure the quality of these projects by implementing in different manners the metrics composing the CK and MOOD suite metrics, whilst MARFCAT has been used to detect vulnerable code files in both case studies. The present study puts the light on the strengths of these tools to measure the quality of proven and largely researched software products.
A Study on Software Metrics and its Impact on Software Quality

Junaid Rashid,Toqeer Mahmood,Muhamad Wasif Nisar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1905.12922

2019-05-30

Abstract:Software metrics offer a quantitative basis for predicting the software development process. In this way, software quality can be improved very easily. Software quality should be achieved to satisfy the customer with decreasing the software cost and improve there liability of the software product. In this research, we have discussed how the software metrics affect the quality of the software and which stages of its development software metrics have applied. We discussed the different software metrics and how these metrics have an impact on software quality and reliability. These techniques have been used for improving the quality of software and increase the revenue.

Software Engineering

Object Oriented Software Metrics Technology

Object Oriented Software Quality Evaluation Technology

A model-based approach to object-oriented software metrics

Software Metrics Evaluation Based on Entropy

Jboomt: Jade Bird Object-Oriented Metrics Tool

Measuring the Contributions of (O)RDBMS to Object-Oriented Software Development

Assessment of maintainability metrics for object-oriented software system

A Metrics-Based Comparative Study on Object-Oriented Programming Languages.

Design and Implementation of Pgrmetrics:A Software Complexity Measurement System

Evaluation of Software Product Quality Metrics

Design Level Metrics to Measure the Complexity Across Versions of AO Software

Software Code Quality Measurement: Implications from Metric Distributions

The Impact of the Object-Oriented Software Evolution on Software Metrics: The Iris Approach

Teaching Software Metrology: The Science of Measurement for Software Engineering

Investigating Software Testability and Test cases Effectiveness

Metrics for Large-scale Software Systems Based on Complex Networks

A Flexible Metric-Driven Framework for Software Process

A MOF-Based Framework for Defining Metrics to Measure the Quality of Models.

Research on Layered Quality Metrics Model for Java Programme

Toward Software Measurement and Quality Analysis of MARF and GIPSY Case Studies a Team 13 SOEN6611-S14 Project Report

A Study on Software Metrics and its Impact on Software Quality