Performance of 3 1 Type PZT/epoxy Composites Compared with 3 1 Type PZT/air Composites

TT Xu,CA Wang
2015-01-01
Rare Metal Materials and Engineering
Abstract:3-1 type PZT/air (longitudinally porous PZT) and 3-1 type PZT/epoxy (epoxy impregnated porous PZT) piezoelectric composites with varying porosity or epoxy volume fractions have been prepared based on freeze-casting process and impregnation process. The composites were characterized in terms of piezoelectric coefficients (d(33) and d(31)), permittivity (epsilon(r)), acoustic impedance (2), hydrostatic figure of merit (HFOM) and compressive strength. With PZT volume fraction increasing, d(33), epsilon(r) and Z increase, while HFOM decrease for both of the PZT composites and there are great differences between these two piezoelectric composites. In each case of d(33) and epsilon(r), PZT/air composites perform better than PZT/epoxy composites. But for Z and HFOM, these two have comparative values. Both of them exhibit increasing compressive strength with volume fraction of non-piezoelectric phase decreasing, while, the PZT/epoxy composites have much higher values than that of PZT/air composites.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?