Abstract:Smart contracts are becoming appealing targets for hackers because of the vast amount of cryptocurrencies under their control. Asset loss due to the exploitation of smart contract codes has increased significantly in recent years. To guarantee that smart contracts are vulnerability-free, there are many works to detect the vulnerabilities of smart contracts, but only a few vulnerability repair works have been proposed. Repairing smart contract vulnerabilities at the source code level is attractive as it is transparent to users, whereas existing repair tools, such as SCRepair and sGuard , suffer from many limitations: (1) ignoring the code of vulnerability prevention; (2) possibly applying the repair to the wrong statements and changing the original business logic of smart contracts; (3) showing poor performance in terms of time and gas overhead. In this work, we propose machine learning guided rule-based automated vulnerability repair on smart contracts to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of sGuard . To address the limitations mentioned above, we design the features that characterize both the symptoms of vulnerabilities and the methods of vulnerability prevention to learn various vulnerability patterns and reduce false positives. Additionally, a fine-grained localization algorithm is designed by traversing the nodes of the abstract syntax tree, and we refine and extend the repair rules of sGuard to preserve the original business logic of smart contracts and support new vulnerability types. Our tool, named sGuard+ , reduces time overhead based on machine learning models, and reduces gas overhead by fewer code changes and precise patching. In our experiment, we collect a publicly available vulnerability dataset from CVE, SWC and SmartBugs Curated as a ground truth for evaluations. Overall, sGuard+ repairs more vulnerabilities with less time and gas overhead than state-of-the-art tools. Furthermore, we reproduce about 9,000 historical transactions for regression testing. It is shown that sGuard+ has no impact on the original business logic of smart contracts.

EShield: Protect Smart Contracts Against Reverse Engineering

Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection Technique: A Survey

Security Reinforcement for Ethereum Virtual Machine

EVM-Shield: In-Contract State Access Control for Fast Vulnerability Detection and Prevention

Making Smart Contract Development More Secure and Easier.

Extended Report on the Obfuscated Integration of Software Protections

Unveiling crypto analysis secrets : A comprehensive analysis of smart contract security within blockchain network environments

An Ever-evolving Game: Evaluation of Real-world Attacks and Defenses in Ethereum Ecosystem.

BiAn: Smart Contract Source Code Obfuscation

Uncover the Premeditated Attacks: Detecting Exploitable Reentrancy Vulnerabilities by Identifying Attacker Contracts

Security Defense for Smart Contracts: A Comprehensive Survey

sGuard+ : Machine Learning Guided Rule-based Automated Vulnerability Repair on Smart Contracts.

Siguard: Detecting Signature-Related Vulnerabilities in Smart Contracts.

A Survey of Ethereum Smart Contract Security: Attacks and Detection

A Critical-Path-Coverage-Based Vulnerability Detection Method for Smart Contracts.

BACKRUNNER: Mitigating Smart Contract Attacks in the Real World

ÆGIS: Shielding Vulnerable Smart Contracts Against Attacks

SafeCheck: Detecting smart contract vulnerabilities based on static program analysis methods

EVMPatch: Timely and Automated Patching of Ethereum Smart Contracts

SmartDagger: a Bytecode-Based Static Analysis Approach for Detecting Cross-Contract Vulnerability

Security Threat Mitigation For Smart Contracts: A Comprehensive Survey