Abstract:Smart contracts are becoming appealing targets for hackers because of the vast amount of cryptocurrencies under their control. Asset loss due to the exploitation of smart contract codes has increased significantly in recent years. To guarantee that smart contracts are vulnerability-free, there are many works to detect the vulnerabilities of smart contracts, but only a few vulnerability repair works have been proposed. Repairing smart contract vulnerabilities at the source code level is attractive as it is transparent to users, whereas existing repair tools, such as SCRepair and sGuard , suffer from many limitations: (1) ignoring the code of vulnerability prevention; (2) possibly applying the repair to the wrong statements and changing the original business logic of smart contracts; (3) showing poor performance in terms of time and gas overhead. In this work, we propose machine learning guided rule-based automated vulnerability repair on smart contracts to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of sGuard . To address the limitations mentioned above, we design the features that characterize both the symptoms of vulnerabilities and the methods of vulnerability prevention to learn various vulnerability patterns and reduce false positives. Additionally, a fine-grained localization algorithm is designed by traversing the nodes of the abstract syntax tree, and we refine and extend the repair rules of sGuard to preserve the original business logic of smart contracts and support new vulnerability types. Our tool, named sGuard+ , reduces time overhead based on machine learning models, and reduces gas overhead by fewer code changes and precise patching. In our experiment, we collect a publicly available vulnerability dataset from CVE, SWC and SmartBugs Curated as a ground truth for evaluations. Overall, sGuard+ repairs more vulnerabilities with less time and gas overhead than state-of-the-art tools. Furthermore, we reproduce about 9,000 historical transactions for regression testing. It is shown that sGuard+ has no impact on the original business logic of smart contracts.

Siguard: Detecting Signature-Related Vulnerabilities in Smart Contracts.

Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection Technique: A Survey

SafeCheck: Detecting smart contract vulnerabilities based on static program analysis methods

Contractsentry: a static analysis tool for smart contract vulnerability detection

sGuard+ : Machine Learning Guided Rule-based Automated Vulnerability Repair on Smart Contracts.

A Survey of Ethereum Smart Contract Security: Attacks and Detection

Efficiently Detecting Reentrancy Vulnerabilities in Complex Smart Contracts

Abusing the Ethereum Smart Contract Verification Services for Fun and Profit

Advanced Security Auditing Methods for Solidity-Based Smart Contracts

Vulpedia: Detecting vulnerable ethereum smart contracts via abstracted vulnerability signatures

All Your Tokens are Belong to Us: Demystifying Address Verification Vulnerabilities in Solidity Smart Contracts

Bug Searching in Smart Contract

DEFECTCHECKER: Automated Smart Contract Defect Detection by Analyzing EVM Bytecode

ContractWard: Automated Vulnerability Detection Models for Ethereum Smart Contracts

Toward Vulnerability Detection for Ethereum Smart Contracts Using Graph-Matching Network

ÆGIS: Shielding Vulnerable Smart Contracts Against Attacks

Ethchecker: a context-guided fuzzing for smart contracts

Security Reinforcement for Ethereum Virtual Machine

Artemis: An Improved Smart Contract Verification Tool for Vulnerability Detection

Demystifying and Detecting Cryptographic Defects in Ethereum Smart Contracts

Research on Security Vulnerability Detection of Smart Contract