Letter to Editor: Central Pancreatectomy Versus Distal Pancreatectomy and Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Benign and Low-Grade Malignant Neoplasms: A Retrospective and Propensity Score-Matched Study with Long-Term Functional Outcomes and Pancreas Volumetry

Shangjin Nanfu Hosptial,Peng Bing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08557-9
IF: 4.339
2020-01-01
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Abstract:It was with great interest that we read the study by Lee et al. This was a very interesting retrospective study which compared short-term and long-term outcomes of central pancreatectomy (CP) with distal pancreatectomy (DP) and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Unlike most other studies, the authors demonstrated that patients in the CP group had lower exocrine function than those in the DP group, concluding that CP should be limited. However, we would like to raise some comments. In this study, the authors compared the pancreatic volume and elastase levels in stool samples in each group. The authors defined the percentage change in the remnant pancreatic volume 12 months after surgery as [(pancreatic volume at 12 months pancreatic volume at 7 days)/pancreatic volume at 7 days] 9 100% and found a significant difference between the two groups (CP 9.4% versus DP ? 7.5%; p\ 0.001). We believe that the outcomes may be worth discussing, as pancreatic volume on day 7 may be inaccurate due to postoperative pancreatitis and tissue edema. The study also showed a decrease in the remnant pancreatic volume but an increase in the stool elastase level 12 months after PD, which may imply that change of stool elastase level alone could not suffice to reflect the exocrine function of the pancreas. Therefore, we suggest more comprehensive comparisons between the groups, including serological tests (pancreatic amylase, lipase, and serum albumin), fecal studies (chymotrypsin and fat), magnetic resonance imaging, body mass index (BMI), and quality of life. Furthermore, although the authors conducted the study using propensity score matching of patients, the median distance between the tumor and the left-side border of the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) in CP and DP groups was 7.8 mm and 12.2 mm, respectively; the p value was 0.087, which is near 0.05. The mean volume of the remnant pancreas 7 days after CP and DP was 49.6 ± 4.4 ml and 43.9 ± 16.4 ml, respectively, which was very close. Iacono reported that CP surgery should preserve at least 5 cm of normal distal pancreatic stump. So, how many cases met this standard in this study? Another key factor was the one played by anastomosis. In the CP group of this study, most patients (81.8%) underwent pancreaticogastrostomy, which may also affect the results as pancreaticogastrostomy may associate with a more severely impaired exocrine function than pancreaticojejunostomy. There probably was a small data mistake in Table 4, where the patient number of unchanged diabetes mellitus in the PD group may be 11 instead of 10. Overall, we deeply appreciate the authors’ work and agree with Lee et al. that CP should be limited, as we also performed 20 cases of laparoscopic central pancreatectomy (LCP) with duct-to-mucosa anastomosis techniques (5 patients underwent pancreaticogastrostomy and 15 patients underwent pancreaticojejunostomy) from January 2016 to January 2019 by a single surgeon. The overall clinically Society of Surgical Oncology 2020
What problem does this paper attempt to address?