Abstract:Objective: To examine the clinical effect of minimally invasive duodenum preserving pancreatic head resection(DPPHR) for benign and pre-malignant lesions of pancreatic head. Methods: The clinical data of patients with diagnosis of benign or pre-malignant pancreatic head tumor were retrospectively collected and analyzed,all of them underwent laparoscopic or robotic DPPHR between October 2015 and September 2021 at Division of Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic surgery,Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital. Thirty-three patients were enrolled with 10 males and 23 females. The age(M(IQR)) was 54(32) years old(range: 11 to 77 years old) and the body mass index was 21.9(2.9)kg/m2(range: 18.1 to 30.1 kg/m2). The presenting symptoms included abdominal pain(n=12), Whipple triad(n=2), and asymptomatic(n=19). There were 7 patients with hypertension and 1 patient with diabetes mellitus. There were 19 patients who were diagnosed as American Society of Anesthesiologists class Ⅰ and 14 patients who were diagnosed as class Ⅱ. The student t test,U test, χ2 test or Fisher exact test was used to compare continuous data or categorized data,respectively. All the perioperative data and metabolic morbidity were analyzed and experiences on minimally invasive DPPHR were concluded. Results: Fourteen patients underwent laparoscopic DPPHR,while the rest of 19 patients received robotic DPPHR. Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging was used in 19 patients to guide operation. Five patients were performed pancreatico-gastrostomy and the rest 28 patients underwent pancreaticojejunostomy. Pathological outcomes confirmed 9 solid pseudo-papillary neoplasms, 9 intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, 7 serous cystic neoplasms, 6 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, 1 mucous cystic neoplasm, 1 chronic pancreatitis. The operative time was (309.4±50.3) minutes(range:180 to 420 minutes),and the blood loss was (97.9±48.3)ml(range:20 to 200 ml). Eighteen patients suffered from postoperative complications,including 3 patients experienced severe complications(Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥Ⅲ). Pancreatic fistula occurred in 16 patients,including 8 patients with biochemical leak,7 patients with grade B pancreatic fistula and 1 patient with grade C pancreatic fistula. No one suffered from the duodenal necrosis and none perioperative death was occurred. The length of hospital stay was 14(7) days (range:6 to 87 days). The follow-up was 22.6(24.5)months(range:2 to 74 months). None suffered from recurrence or metastasis. During the follow-up,all the patients were free of refractory cholangitis. Moreover,in the term of endocrine dysfunction,no postoperative new onset of diabetes mellitus were observed in the long-term follow-up. However,in the view of exocrine insufficiency,pancreatic exocrine insufficiency and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) was complicated in 2 and 1 patient,respectively,with the supplement of pancreatic enzyme,steatorrhea and weight loss relieved,but NAFLD was awaited to be seen. Conclusions: Minimally invasive DPPHR is feasible and safe for benign or pre-malignant lesions of pancreatic head. Moreover,it is oncological equivalent to pancreaticoduodenectomy with preservation of metabolic function without refractory cholangitis.

Central Pancreatectomy Is a Better Choice for Benign or Low-Grade Malignant Pancreatic Tumors in the Neck and Body of the Pancreas: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of 296 Cases

Central Pancreatectomy for Benign or Low-Grade Malignant Pancreatic Tumors in the Neck and Body of the Pancreas.

Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a single-center propensity score matching study

Expanding Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy to Pancreatic-Head and Periampullary Malignancy: Major Findings Based on Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Is Central Pancreatectomy Truly Recommendable? A 9-Year Single-Center Experience

Patients get more long-term benefit from central pancreatectomy than distal resection: A meta-analysis

Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery

Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Total Pancreatic Head Resection with Duodenum and Bile Duct Preserving: a Report of 31 Patients

Central pancreatectomy: An uncommon but potentially optimal choice of pancreatic resection

Laparoscopic central pancreatectomy with pancreaticojejunostomy: preliminary experience with 8 cases.

Central versus distal pancreatectomy for low-grade and benign pancreatic neck-body tumours

Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign or premalignant pancreatic neoplasms: A two-center comparative study

Clinical Effect of Minimally Invasive Duodenum Preserving Pancreatic Head Resection for Benign and Pre-Malignant Lesions of Pancreatic Head

Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreatic Resection for Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Separate Propensity Score Matching Analyses of Distal Pancreatectomy and Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

LDP vs ODP for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a case matched study from a single-institution

Evolution Of Laparoscopic Pancreatic Resections For Pancreatic And Periampullary Diseases: Perioperative Outcomes Of 605 Patients At A High-Volume Center

Laparoscopicvsopen Distal Pancreatectomy for Solid Pseudopapillary Tumor of the Pancreas

Safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive central pancreatectomy versus open central pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Total Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: a Propensity Score Matching Analysis with Meta-Analysis

Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy is As Safe and Feasible As Open Procedure: a Meta-Analysis.