Site U1433

C.-F. Li,J. Lin,D.K. Kulhanek,T. Williams,R. Bao,A. Briais,E.A. Brown,Y. Chen,P.D. Clift,F.S. Colwell,K.A. Dadd,W.-W. Ding,I. Hernández-Almeida,X.-L. Huang,S. Hyun,T. Jiang,A.A.P. Koppers,Q. Li,C. Liu,Q. Liu,Z. Liu,R.H. Nagai,A. Peleo-Alampay,X. Su,Z. Sun,M.L.G. Tejada,H.S. Trinh,Y.-C. Yeh,C. Zhang,F. Zhang,G.-L. Zhang,X. Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14379/iodp.proc.349.105.2015
2015-01-01
Abstract:Because of the marked contrast in magnetic anomaly amplitude between the Southwest and East Subbasins of the South China Sea (SCS) (Yao, 1995; Jin et al., 2002; Li et al., 2007, 2008), it is justifiable to question whether rifting and drifting within these 2 subbasins were synchronous or diachronous and how these subbasins evolved in comparison to the Northwest Subbasin. Site U1433 is located in the Southwest Subbasin near the relict spreading center and magnetic Anomaly C5d identified by Briais et al. (1993) (Figures F1, F2, F3). Together with Site U1431 in the East Subbasin, coring at these sites will help to explain the sharp differences in magnetic amplitude between the East and Southwest Subbasins and test the hypothesis that in the Southwest Subbasin the transition from continental rifting to seafloor spreading occurred more recently than in the East Subbasin (Pautot et al., 1986). Coring will help determine the age of this subbasin near the end of the spreading and correlate ages from magnetic anomalies with biostratigraphic, magnetostratigraphic, and radiometric ages. The apparent weak magnetization in basement rocks suggested by the magnetic anomaly amplitudes will be examined by petrological analyses of chemical compositions and measurements of magnetic susceptibility. The specific objectives at this site are to
What problem does this paper attempt to address?