Site U1435

C.-F. Li,J. Lin,D.K. Kulhanek,T. Williams,R. Bao,A. Briais,E.A. Brown,Y. Chen,P.D. Clift,F.S. Colwell,K.A. Dadd,W.-W. Ding,I. Hernández-Almeida,X.-L. Huang,S. Hyun,T. Jiang,A.A.P. Koppers,Q. Li,C. Liu,Q. Liu,Z. Liu,R.H. Nagai,A. Peleo-Alampay,X. Su,Z. Sun,M.L.G. Tejada,H.S. Trinh,Y.-C. Yeh,C. Zhang,F. Zhang,G.-L. Zhang,X. Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14379/iodp.proc.349.107.2015
2015-01-01
Abstract:Coring at Site U1435 became a high priority after failing to achieve our basement objectives at Site U1432 because the final cementing operation compromised the reentry system. This site was originally added as an alternate because of the high risk of being unable to reach basement at Site U1432, which required ~1900 m of penetration to reach the target depth. Site U1435 is located on a structural high at the transition between the extended continental crust and the oceanic crust (Figures F1, F2). Similar conspicuous structural-high features can be found on the continent/ocean boundary in many other seismic profiles crossing the South China Sea northern margin and therefore appear to represent tectonic structures typical of the area. The true lithology and formation mechanism of this structural high were speculative; it could be a volcanic extrusion associated with continental extension at the onset of seafloor spreading, lower crust material emplaced from preferential lower crust extension, exhumed mantle material, or a structural high composed of older (Mesozoic) sedimentary rocks. Coring at this location was designed to help pinpoint the exact nature of this structure and improve our understanding of early continental breakup, the rift-to-drift transition, and seafloor spreading processes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?