Interactive comment on “Patterns in atmospheric carbonaceous aerosols in China: emission

Hongfei Cui,Pan Mao,Yu Zhao,Chris P. Nielsen,Jie Zhang
2015-01-01
Abstract:the study. Without more comprehensive understanding of assumptions and limitations of EC tracer method, which is used to be estimate SOC, the present work towards SOC part is inaccurate or even erroneous. The paper should clear state in the paper what are new findings about carbonaceous aerosols in China. I suggest including more new findings towards carbonaceous aerosols studies (observations and source apportionment studies) in China. Discussion of source and POC/SOC source apportionment based on OC/EC ratios alone is not sufficient. From the method used in the current work, SOC and biomass burning OC could not be separated, therefore, the conclusion of the enhanced SOC across in China can be misleading. Similarly, the trend of OC/EC ratios should be carefully examined by re-considering measurement uncertainty in different studies by different analytic methods. In my opinion, the methodology applied by the authors does not allow distinction of SOC and POC in a national scale.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?