Abstract:The proposed article is devoted to the figure of Secretary of State Dean Rusk during the presidency of John F. Kennedy in 1961–1963, with special attention to the interpersonal relationship between him and the president. The purpose of the work is to emphasize the importance of studying the interaction between the president and the secretary of state, which often plays a key role in the formulation and implementation of the foreign policy of the United States of America. The ability of the president and his secretary of state to listen to each other and communicate effectively can determine success or failure in implementing foreign policy initiatives and managing crisis situations. The research methodology is based on a critical analysis of scientific literature, as well as on the application of problem-chronological and systemic approaches. The basic principles of the article are the principle of historicism, objectivity and scientificity. Comparative, historical-systemic, historical-genetic methods are used for scientific understanding of the proposed problem. The scientific novelty of the article consists in drawing the attention of researchers to the figure of Dean Rusk, as well as in offering a different point of view on Dean Rusk’s place in the relationship with President J. Kennedy. Contrary to the prevailing view of Dean Rusk’s insecurity, mysteriousness, and modesty as the key to his failure as the president’s foreign policy advisor, we argue that these aspects became «victorious» in interaction with the president, acting as a certain «balancing factor» of J. Kennedy’s activism. Conclusions. The relationship between John F. Kennedy and Dean Rusk was complicated and occasionally strained. J. Kennedy and D. Rusk had different views on foreign policy issues. J. Kennedy often avoided the opinions of D. Rusk, did not always fully trust him, or did not consider his opinion reliable. Wanting to be the main initiator of the foreign policy of the United States of America. The crises that the US faced in the early 1960s were partly the result of the politics of interpersonal attitudes: both Dean Rusk and J. Kennedy were individuals who did not correspond to the essence of America in the late 1950s and early 1960s (in the context of a globalized understanding of foreign policy), however, it is unlikely that Kennedy would have been able to find a better candidate for the position of Secretary of State than Dean Rusk (in the context of interpersonal relations).

return Differentiation and Misunderstanding in the U . S . Government : Political and Military Communications during the Cuban Missile Crisis

The Two Faces of American Power: Military and Political Communication during the Cuban Missile Crisis

Models of Strategic Decision-Making under Informational Control

THE IMPACT OF THE CUBAN MISSILE CRISIS ON SOVIET MIDDLE EASTERN POLICY. HOW IT LED TO THE SIX-DAY WAR, 1967

FOUNDATIONS OF CRISIS COMMUNICATION AND THEIR APPLICATION IN INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL COMMUNICATION STRATEGY. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS: THE PRESIDENTIAL ADMINISTRATION OF USA VS THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION

9/11 and the Advent of Total Diplomacy: Strategic communication as a primary weapon of war

Influence from Abroad: Foreign Voices, the Media and U.S. Public Opinion

FOREIGN POLICY OF J. KENNEDY: THE PERSONAL FACTOR IN THE COOPERATION BETWEEN THE PRESIDENT AND SECRETARY OF STATE D. RUSK

Political Instability and the Failure of Deterrence

The Anatomy of Foreign Policy Crises

AMERICAN CRUISE MISSILES

Communicative Competencies and the Structuration of Expectations: The creative tension between Habermas' critical theory and Luhmann's social systems theory

The Suez Crisis in the US Foreign Policy Strategy in the Middle East: Risks and Prospects.

Intellectual or Expert:Behind the Dualism in Communication Studies

To adapt to the Cold War bipolar order? Or to challenge it? Macmillan and de Gaulle’s rift in the face of the Second Berlin Crisis

MEDIA MANAGEMENT AND CRISIS COMMUNICATIONS: THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPLEMENTING KEY PROVISIONS OF THE MEDIA IN THE RESPONSE METHODOLOGY

Mistrust, Misperception, and Misunderstanding: Imperfect Information and Conflict Dynamics

Social Drama at Macro and Micro Levels

Framing Strategic Conflicts: Redesign of the American Negotiating Style

A study on the interaction between foreign military advisory groups and social change under the perspective of hierarchy-centered on the u.s. maag in taiwan and the r.o.c military advisory group in vietnam during the cold war

Mutual desecuritization as a model of détente? Foreign policy change in the US-Cuban dyad