Abstract:Frege’s logic, which denies the factors of mankind and his mind, is just suitable in some fields, e.g. in deduction, but not in induction, of mathematics. We would be wrong if we extended his truth to other fields, for example, daily life or philosophy. Something like the factors of mankind and mental elements that Frege gave up is just the starting point of new revolution in logic and philosophy. After Frege, logicians and philosophers returned to the natural language in the middle of the 20~ th century. J. L.Austin (1955) found some kinds of utterances, performatives that are of doing something in saying something, which are meaningful but not true or false. Then, he created his famous theory of speech acts, which is the foundational theory of pragmatics that gives consideration to man, the user of language. N.Chomsky (1957) developed his syntactic theory in rationalism and psychologism, which takes Language Faculty (LF) as innate, viewing language as the mirror of mind. After these developments, a new inter-discipline, cognitive science, was set up in the mid 1970s. Therefore, this author thinks that it would be necessary to institute a new frame of logic in the background of cognitive science, say, cognitive logic. The author got the cognitive logic system made up of six disciplines-philosophical logic, mental logic, logic of language, logics in culture and evolution, logics in AI, and logic of neuro-web-by mapping six branches of cognitive science into the fields of modern logic. The author points out that some new fields of cognitive logic, such as mental logic and logic in culture and evolution should be paid more attention to. In this paper, the different characteristics of mental logic and Frege’s logic are analyzed in detail. Mental logic is a new discipline integrating logic with psychology, in which the mentation that Frege had forsaken came back again into logic. The author points out that logic faculty, like language faculty, is also innate. Therefore, logic must have some certain structures and modalities that are genetic, innate and mental. Finally, the author concludes that logic cannot function in exploring man's mind in cognitive science until it has returned to mankind himself.

Principle of Universal Logics

Logic Teaching in China: Past and Present

Advancing Logic in AI: Insights from the LNGAI 2021 Workshop

Logic Across the University: Foundations and Applications

Logic and AI in China: an Introduction

Logic:A Growing and Changing Concept

Preface of the Special Issue‘logic, Argumentation and AI’ in JLC

Quantum Look at two Common Logics: the Logic of Primitive Thinking and the Logic of Everyday Human Reasoning

A Report on the Chinese National Conference on Modern Logic

Between Philosophy and Mathematics

Toward a Hierarchal "View of Logic in Broad Sense"——Retrospection and Reflection of the Two Major Disputes on "View of Logic"

Recognizing the existence of Chinese Logic

Universal Logic as a Science of Patterns

The Fundamental Theory of Artificial Intelligence—Logic Structure and Logic Engineering

Interpretation into the Principle of Dichotomy of Thought and Expression in Law of Copyright

Problem Concerning Logic in Quantum Cosmology

Logic, Mind and Cognition——On the Development of Logic in the post-Frege Time

Explanation on Principle of Universal Access to Information

Thinking through Sets: Exploring How Chinese Pictographic Language Shapes Chinese Logic

Heavenly Principles? the Translation of International Law in 19Th-Century China and the Constitution of Universality

The logical nature of Systemic-Functional Grammar and “grammatical logic”