A proof of the alexanderov ’ s uniqueness theorem for convex surfaces in r

PENGFEI GUAN,ZHIZHANG WANG,XIANGWEN ZHANG
2014-01-01
Abstract:We give a new proof of a classical uniqueness theorem of Alexandrov [4] using the weak uniqueness continuation theorem of Bers-Nirenberg [8]. We prove a version of this theorem with the minimal regularity assumption: the spherical hessians of the corresponding convex bodies as Radon measures are nonsingular. We give a new proof of the following uniqueness theorem of Alexandrov, using the Weak Unique Continuation Theorem of Bers-Nirenberg [8]. Theorem 1 (Theorem 9 in [4]). Suppose M1 and M2 are two closed strictly convex C 2 surfaces in R3, suppose f(y1, y2) ∈ C1 is a function such that ∂f ∂y1 ∂f ∂y2 > 0. Denote κ1 ≥ κ2 the principal curvatures of surfaces, and denote νM1 and νM2 the Gauss maps of M1 and M2 respectively. If (1) f(κ1(ν −1 M1 (x), κ2(ν −1 M1 (x)) = f(κ1(ν −1 M2 (x), κ2(ν −1 M2 (x)), ∀x ∈ S, then M1 is equal to M2 up to a translation. This classical result was first proved for analytical surfaces by Alexandrov in [3], for C4 surfaces by Pogorelov in [20], and Hartman-Wintner [14] reduced regularity to C3, see also [21]. Pogorelov [22, 23] published certain uniqueness results for C2 surfaces, these general results would imply Theorem 1 in C2 case. It was pointed out in [19] that the proof of Pogorelov is erroneous, it contains an uncorrectable mistake (see page 301-302 in [19]). There is a counter-example of Martinez-Maure [15] (see also [19]) to the main claims in [22, 23]. The results by Han-Nadirashvili-Yuan [13] imply two proofs of Theorem 1, one for C2 surfaces and another for C2,α surfaces. The problem is often reduced to a uniqueness problem for linear elliptic equations in appropriate settings, either on S2 or in R3, we refer [4, 21]. Here we will concentrate on the corresponding equation on S2, as in [11]. The advantage in this setting is that it is globally defined. If M is a strictly convex surface with support function u, then the principal curvatures at ν−1(x) are the reciprocals of the principal radii λ1, λ2 of M , which are the eigenvalues of spherical Hessian Wu(x) = (uij(x) + u(x)δij) where uij are the covariant derivatives with respect to any given local orthonormal frame on S2. Set F̃ (Wu) =: f( 1 λ1(Wu) , 1 λ2(Wu) ) = f(κ1, κ2). (2) Date: September 8, 2014. 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. 53A05, 53C24. Research of the first author was supported in part by an NSERC Discovery Grant.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?