Closed-Suction Drainage Versus No Drainage In Total Hip Arthroplasty, A Meta-Analysis Of Randomized Controlled Trials

Pengfei Zan,Weifeng Wang,Lin Fan,Zhong Wu,Xiao Yu,Tianyang Xu,Guodong Li
2016-01-01
Abstract:Purpose: The closed-suction drainage is widely used in total hip arthroplasty. However, controversy still exists regarding the use of closed-suction drainage after total hip arthroplasty. With this study, we intended to test whether the closed-suction drainage is safe and effective considering the clinical outcome measures. Methods: A comprehensive literature searching was performed in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and other internet database. All the relevant studies designed were retrieved to interpret this issue. The searching time frame was from the establishing of these databases until July 2015. Results: Twelve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing a total of 1498 patients and 1524 hips were included. The results of our Meta-analysis indicate that the closed suction drainage prolongs the length of hospital stay and operation time, increases the amount of patients requiring for transfusion and the mean transfusion unit. However, it is encouraging that the drainage can decrease the wound related complications, patients of reinforcement and wound hematoma, lessen the change in mid-thigh circumstance. No significant difference was found on other measurements, including blood loss, infection, volume of hematoma, DVT and PE and the Harris score. Conclusions: Based on the current evidence, the closed suction drainage though was still filled with controversy, it may supply more benefit aspects after THA. More carefully and scientifically designed RCTs are still required to further demonstrate the claim.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?