Efficacy and safety of drainage after total knee arthroplasty

Feng Jing,Huimin Li,Xudong Yang,Bing Li,Jing Ji,Yaling Li,Changjiao Sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2017.27.014
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To determine whether suction drainage is safe and effective compared with no-drainage in total knee arthroplasty.Methods The literature search was based on PubMed,MEDLINE,EMBASE,Highwire,the Cochrane Library,CBM,CNKI,VIP and WFSD.The data were analysed using RevMan 5.3.Fourteen randomised controlled trials involving 1 009 knees were included in our analysis.Results Suction drainage increases the rate and volume of blood transfusion.No-drainage group increases the rate of wound problems (OR =1.92,95 % CI 1.21-3.04,P < 0.05).No significant difference was observed in the incidence of periprosthetic infection (OR =0.68,95% CI 0.20-2.30,P =0.54),VAS (OR =-0.09,95% CI-0.32-0.14,P =0.46) and the length of stay (OR =0.41,95% CI-0.21-1.03;P =0.19) when the drainage group was compared with the no-drainage group (P>0.05).Conclusions No-drainage for easy total knee arthroplasty may be a better choice.However,orthopedic surgeon need to weigh the pros and cons of no-drainage in some complicated TKAs such as extra-articular deformity.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?