Abstract:This paper reports on studies of the analytical procedures for measuring dispersant effectiveness in the laboratory. Previous papers reported on the development of a gas chromatographic method for measuring dispersant effectiveness. This method was shown to have far greater accuracy than the old colorimetric methods. A new gas chromatographic method has been developed and tested which shows improvements in the data quality and time required for analysis. New characteristics of the method include: correction for very low oil-in water values, use of fewer calibration points directly around the expected value, and a different method for heavier oils with fewer resolvable chromatographic peaks. The new method is demonstrated by comparing results with older methods. 1.0 Introduction During the years from 1985 to 1990, Environment Canada and the United States Minerals Management Service endeavoured to develop new laboratory dispersant effectiveness tests that provided repeatable results with systems that have relation to the open waters where dispersants are actually used to combat oil spills. During this time, five tests were examined out of a total suite of about 20 possibilities. Initial work was done on the possible test concepts to assess potential for further study. The tests that were selected for detailed comparative testing were done so on the basis that they were tests used by other organizations ( eg. Mackay Nadeau-Steelman tests, Warren Springs or Labofina test and the IFP test) or showed potential for further development (swirling flask and flowing column tests) (Fingas et al. 1987). This comparative testing showed that all five tests could produce effectiveness results of the same order-of-magnitude if: a) the oil-to-water ratio was maintained high (greater than 1:1000) and b) if the settling time was maintained at 0r1:at1'r than l 0 minutes, The following factors were not found to change results to a large degree: a) vessel shape b) mode of energy application and c) general experimental setup. The relative amount of energy applied was found to have a very large effect on the results. Further development work was conducted on the swirling flask test (Fingas et al. 1989). Tests included altering each experimental parameter to measure the effect. This work was done for purely scientific reasons as well as to ensure that testing was at an tests anomalies because their operational pm:an1eters v;ere and variances in performing the experiment produced noisy results. This study is one of a continuing series exploring laboratory dispersant effectiveness testing (Fingas et al. 1996, 1997, 1998). In this paper we report on improved methods for analysing the oil-in-water using gas chromatography. Rather than the colorimetric methodology, which has several limitations, a gas chromatographic method has been developed (Fingas et al. 1995). The older colorimetric measurements were encumbered with high noise levels which often obscured the phenomena being measured. The traditional colorimetric method of measuring laboratory dispersant effoctiveness is to take a small aliqnot ofthc dispersion test water, extract the oil, usually with methylene chloride, and then measure the colour at a specific wavelength. This value is compared to a standard curve and effectiveness calculated. The preparation of the standard curve was traditionally done by injecting the appropriate amount of oil directly into the methylene chloride and measuring light absorbance. It was found that the traditional approach ofpreparing standard curves was somewhat in error because the simple addition of water to the extraction process produced some colouration in the methylene chloride, despite drying the extract This results in inflated effectiveness values. Experiments were conducted to investigate the problem (Fingas et al. 1995). Sample extracts of the methylene chloride were analysed both by the colorimetric method and by gas chromatography. Light oils have low absorbance at the typical wavelengths chosen and were found to give errors using traditional methods of analysis by as much as 300%. More typical medium oils showed errors of only a few percent, but heavy oils again show significant error because of the different wavelengths at which they absorb. Several methods of compensating for this effect were tried and found to be inadequate to compensate for this effect The chromatographic method and implementation for the swirling flask test that was described in a prior paper (Fingas et al. 1995) contained some weaknesses and these were overcome by implementing several changes (Fingas et al. 1998). 2.0 Experimental The standard swirling flask method was employed as described in the Appendix to this paper. All analysis was performed only by gas chromatography. The chromatography procedure was modified using standard procedures published in the literature (Wang and Fingas, 1997, Fingas et al. 1998). Six replicates were perfom1ed for each oil and dispersant combination. Only two replicates are conducted during the same batch run of six samples, providing for statistical variation between experimental runs. A 114 portion of the water column is collected from each sample, and the dispersed petroleum content determined by GC analysis. A standard curve is then obtained from a set of six prepared standards, each representing a percentage of the total volume of oil and dispersant used for the samples. A plot of the volume percentage against the determined mass of oil yields a linear equation ofpercentage versus mass. Substituting the mass ofdispersed oil determined for the samples into the standard equation, corrected for the ratio of sample collected, provides a measure of the dispersant effectiveness in percentage. Any affects due to weathering or the extraction process are accounted for by same extraction procedures as samples.

The Development and Application of a Modified Analytical Procedure for Laboratory Dispersant Testing

Analytical Procedures for Dispersant Effectiveness Testing

A Surface Tension Based Method for Measuring Oil Dispersant Concentration in Seawater

Parallel Quantitation of Salt Dioctyl Sodium Sulfosuccinate (DOSS) and Fingerprinting Analysis of Dispersed Oil in Aqueous Samples.

The application of GC in the study of the effect of oil spill dispersant

COMPOSITIONAL CHANGES IN DISPERSED CRUDE OIL IN THE WATER COLUMN DURING A NEARSHORE TEST SPILL

Dispersants as marine oil spill treating agents: a review on mesoscale tests and field trials

Stability Research Of Dispersant Effectiveness On Calm Seawater

Research on Development and Effectiveness Evaluation Technology of New Environment-friendly Oil Spill Dispersant

The NET effect of dispersants - a critical review of testing and modelling of surface oil dispersion

EFFECTS OF CHEMICAL DISPERSANT ON OIL SEDIMENTATION DUE TO OIL-SPM FLOCCULATION: EXPERIMENTS WITH THE NIST STANDARD REFERENCE MATERIAL 1941?

Combined Effects of Chemical Dispersant and Suspended Minerals on the Dispersion Process of Spilled Oil.

Interlaboratory Comparison of a Biomimetic Extraction Method Applied to Oil Sands Process-Affected Waters

Dispersion, Sorption and Photodegradation of Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Dispersant-Seawater-Sediment Systems

Effects of Oil Properties on the Formation of Oil-Particle Aggregates at the Presence of Chemical Dispersant in Baffled Flask Tests.

Effects of dispersant addition on diesel oil biodegradation in marine environment

Comparative Toxicity of Five Dispersants to Test Organisms at Different Trophic Levels: Platymonas Helgolandica , Ruditapes Philippinarum , and Acinetobacter Sp. Tox2

Metagenomic and Metatranscriptomic Responses of Chemical Dispersant Application during a Marine Dilbit Spill

Assessment of spilled oil dispersion affected by dispersant: Characteristic, stability, and related mechanism

Simulating dispersion of oils from a subsea release comparing mechanical and chemically enhanced dispersion - An experimental study of the influence of oil properties

Microemulsification: An Approach for Analytical Determinations