1 Data inversion methods to determine sub-3 nm aerosol size 1 distributions using the Particle Size Magnifier 2

Runlong Cai,Dongsen Yang,Lauri R. Ahonen,Linlin Shi,Frans Korhonen,Yan Ma,Jiming,Hao,Tuukka Petäjä,Jun Zheng,Juha Kangasluoma,Jingkun Jiang
2018-01-01
Abstract:Measuring particle size distribution accurately down to approximately 1 nm is needed for studying atmospheric 13 new particle formation. The scanning particle size magnifier (PSM) using diethylene glycol as the working fluid has been 14 used for measuring sub-3 nm atmospheric aerosol. A proper inversion method is required to recover the particle size 15 distribution from PSM raw data. Similar to other aerosol spectrometers and classifiers, PSM inversion can be deduced to 16 a problem described by the Fredholm integral equation of the first kind. We tested the performance of the step-wising 17 method, the kernel function method (Lehtipalo et al., 2014), the H&A linear inversion method (Hagen and Alofs, 1983), 18 and the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm. The step-wising method and the kernel function method were used in 19 previous studies on PSM. The H&A method and the expectation-maximization algorithm were used in data inversion for 20 the electrical mobility spectrometers and the diffusion batteries (Maher and Laird., 1985), respectively. In addition, Monte 21 Carlo simulation and laboratory experiments were used to test the accuracy and precision of the particle size distributions 22 recovered using four inversion methods. When all of the detected particles are larger than 3 nm, the step-wising method 23 may report false sub-3 nm particle concentrations because of assuming an infinite resolution, while the kernel function 24 method and the H&A method occasionally reports false sub-3 nm particles because of using the unstable least square 25 method. The accuracy and precision of the recovered particle size distribution using the EM algorithm are the best among 26 the tested four inversion methods. Compared to the kernel function method, the H&A method reduces the uncertainty 27 while keeping a similar computational expense. The measuring uncertainties in the present scanning mode may contribute 28 to the uncertainties of the recovered particle size distributions. We suggest using the EM algorithm to retrieve the particle 29 size distributions using the particle number concentrations recorded by the PSM. Considering the relatively high 30 computation expenses of the EM algorithm, the H&A method is recommended to be used for preliminary data analysis. 31 We also gave practical suggestions on PSM operation based on the inversion analysis. 32 Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2018-35 Manuscript under review for journal Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discussion started: 26 February 2018 c © Author(s) 2018. CC BY 4.0 License.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?