Abstract:Background An important subfamily of membrane proteins are the transmembrane α-helical proteins, in which the membrane-spanning regions are made up of α-helices. Given the obvious biological and medical significance of these proteins, it is of tremendous practical importance to identify the location of transmembrane segments. The difficulty of inferring the secondary or tertiary structure of transmembrane proteins using experimental techniques has led to a surge of interest in applying techniques from machine learning and bioinformatics to infer secondary structure from primary structure in these proteins. We are therefore interested in determining which physicochemical properties are most useful for discriminating transmembrane segments from non-transmembrane segments in transmembrane proteins, and for discriminating intrinsically unstructured segments from intrinsically structured segments in transmembrane proteins, and in using the results of these investigations to develop classifiers to identify transmembrane segments in transmembrane proteins. Results We determined that the most useful properties for discriminating transmembrane segments from non-transmembrane segments and for discriminating intrinsically unstructured segments from intrinsically structured segments in transmembrane proteins were hydropathy, polarity, and flexibility, and used the results of this analysis to construct classifiers to discriminate transmembrane segments from non-transmembrane segments using four classification techniques: two variants of the Self-Organizing Global Ranking algorithm, a decision tree algorithm, and a support vector machine algorithm. All four techniques exhibited good performance, with out-of-sample accuracies of approximately 75%. Conclusions Several interesting observations emerged from our study: intrinsically unstructured segments and transmembrane segments tend to have opposite properties; transmembrane proteins appear to be much richer in intrinsically unstructured segments than other proteins; and, in approximately 70% of transmembrane proteins that contain intrinsically unstructured segments, the intrinsically unstructured segments are close to transmembrane segments.

Prediction of Transmembrane Protein Topology Based on Power Average Operator

Fuzzy prediction of transmembrane protein topology

The Combination Prediction of Transmembrane Regions Based on Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence

Prediction of membrane protein types in a hybrid space.

TOPPER: Topology Prediction of Transmembrane Protein Based on Evidential Reasoning

Enhance the Recognition of Signal Peptide Domain and Transmembrane Domain Based on Transformer

Evaluation for prediction methods of α-helix transmembrane protein topology

Structure Prediction of Membrane Proteins

Using Pseudo Amino Acid Composition to Predict Transmembrane Regions in Protein: Cellular Automata and Lempel-Ziv Complexity

Transmembrane Topology Identification by Fusing Evolutionary and Co-evolutionary Information with Cascaded Bidirectional Transformers

An Improved Algorithm For Transmembrane Protein Prediction

Improving Transmembrane Protein Consensus Topology Prediction Using Inter-Helical Interaction.

Topology Prediction Improvement of Α-Helical Transmembrane Proteins Through Helix-tail Modeling and Multiscale Deep Learning Fusion.

Domain Position Prediction Based on Sequence Information by Using Fuzzy Mean Operator

Prediction of Multi-Type Membrane Proteins in Human by an Integrated Approach.

Investigation of Transmembrane Proteins Using a Computational Approach

Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes.

TMPSS: A Deep Learning-Based Predictor for Secondary Structure and Topology Structure Prediction of Alpha-Helical Transmembrane Proteins

Analysis and prediction of protein folding energy changes upon mutation by element specific persistent homology

Transmembrane Helices Topology Prediction: Using a Simplified Transmembrane HMM

The Introduction of Transmembrane Protein Database