Abstract:Background An important subfamily of membrane proteins are the transmembrane α-helical proteins, in which the membrane-spanning regions are made up of α-helices. Given the obvious biological and medical significance of these proteins, it is of tremendous practical importance to identify the location of transmembrane segments. The difficulty of inferring the secondary or tertiary structure of transmembrane proteins using experimental techniques has led to a surge of interest in applying techniques from machine learning and bioinformatics to infer secondary structure from primary structure in these proteins. We are therefore interested in determining which physicochemical properties are most useful for discriminating transmembrane segments from non-transmembrane segments in transmembrane proteins, and for discriminating intrinsically unstructured segments from intrinsically structured segments in transmembrane proteins, and in using the results of these investigations to develop classifiers to identify transmembrane segments in transmembrane proteins. Results We determined that the most useful properties for discriminating transmembrane segments from non-transmembrane segments and for discriminating intrinsically unstructured segments from intrinsically structured segments in transmembrane proteins were hydropathy, polarity, and flexibility, and used the results of this analysis to construct classifiers to discriminate transmembrane segments from non-transmembrane segments using four classification techniques: two variants of the Self-Organizing Global Ranking algorithm, a decision tree algorithm, and a support vector machine algorithm. All four techniques exhibited good performance, with out-of-sample accuracies of approximately 75%. Conclusions Several interesting observations emerged from our study: intrinsically unstructured segments and transmembrane segments tend to have opposite properties; transmembrane proteins appear to be much richer in intrinsically unstructured segments than other proteins; and, in approximately 70% of transmembrane proteins that contain intrinsically unstructured segments, the intrinsically unstructured segments are close to transmembrane segments.

Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes.

Transmembrane Helices Topology Prediction: Using a Simplified Transmembrane HMM

[A Novel Segment-Training Algorithm for Transmembrane Helices Prediction].

Prediction of membrane protein types in a hybrid space.

Structure Prediction of Membrane Proteins

Evaluation for prediction methods of α-helix transmembrane protein topology

Structure Topology Prediction of Discriminative Sequence Motifs in Membrane Proteins with Domains of Unknown Functions

Prediction of Membrane Protein Types from Sequences And. Position-Specific Scoring Matrices

Prediction of Transmembrane Proteins from Their Primary Sequence by Support Vector Machine Approach

An hierarchical artificial neural network system for the classification of transmembrane proteins

Prediction of Multi-Type Membrane Proteins in Human by an Integrated Approach.

TM Finder: A prediction program for transmembrane protein segments using a combination of hydrophobicity and nonpolar phase helicity scales

A novel method for predicting transmembrane segments in proteins based on a statistical analysis of the SwissProt database: the PRED-TMR algorithm

TMPSS: A Deep Learning-Based Predictor for Secondary Structure and Topology Structure Prediction of Alpha-Helical Transmembrane Proteins

Hidden Markov Model Variants and their Application

A novel mixed-signal digital CMOS fuzzy logic controller in current mode

Prediction of outer membrane proteins by combining the position- and composition-based features of sequence profiles.

Machine learning in computational modelling of membrane protein sequences and structures: from methodologies to applications

Analysis of protein transmembrane helical regions by a neural network

Investigation of Transmembrane Proteins Using a Computational Approach

Topology of the membrane protein LamB by epitope tagging and a comparison with the X-ray model