Interactive comment on “Tropospheric HONO Distribution and Chemistry in the Southeast U.S.” by Chunxiang Ye et al

Chunxiang Ye
2018-01-01
Abstract:simply because HONO photo-lifetime is 8 minutes. We would first like to point out that there has not been any report in literature for 10 ppbv daytime HONO on the ground level, as the referee assumed. The daytime HONO/NOx ratio is in the range of 0.05-0.1 in the low-NOx rural atmosphere (Zhou et al., 2002) and ∼ 0.02 in high-NOx urban environment (Villena et al., 2011). The direct emission HONO/NOx ratios are even lower, ≤0.01 in automobile exhausts (Kirchstetter et al., 1996; Li et al., 2008) and ∼0.002 in power plant plumes (Neuman et al., 2016). The NOx levels that we observed in the Southeast U.S. was mostly under 0.5 ppbv in the background area and even in the urban plumes; the initial HONO concentration associated with the observed levels of NOx would be ≤ 50 pptv even if an upper limit HONO/NOx ratio of 0.1 is assumed. With a transport time of ∼1 h from the source, i.e., ∼ 5 times of the HONO photolysis lifetime, the contribution from the source would be well below the detection limit of 1 pptv of our HONO instrument. Therefore, we argued that the measured HONO was mostly produced in situ from precursors such as NOx and pNO3 within the air masses during the transport, not from the ground HONO sources.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?