What Makes Local Governments More Accountable? Evidence from a Website Reform∗

Daniel Berkowitz,Yi Lu,Mingqin Wu

2019-01-01

Abstract:There is evidence that local governments around the world collect bribes and make inefficient investments. What can influence local governments to reduce corruption and to invest responsibly? Ferraz and Finan (2012) show that local governments in Brazil are less corrupt when their mayors can stand for re-election and when a radio station and/or newspaper monitors them. In China, however, local (county-level) leaders are not elected and the state tightly controls the media. Nevertheless, using a large-scale reform in which some counties were required to post their data and to setup communication links for their constituents on their websites, we find that corruption fell substantially and public investments sharply increased in treated versus control counties. We interpret these findings using a model where county leaders benefit from being promoted and from collecting rents and, higher-level governments use postings from private citizens on social media to monitor country governments under their jurisdiction. Consistent with this mechanism, we find that following the enactment of the reform citizens in treated versus control counties massively increased their blogging on the social media using words related to government corruption and public investments. Satellite light data and sentiment tests suggest the reform led to an improvement in the quality of public investments in treated versus control counties.