Therapy Comparison Between SMILE and Off-Flap Epi-LASIK
Chen Xiangfei,Lu Yan,Wang Chunhong,Yang Liping,Huang Zhenping
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845x.2018.05.009
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To compare one-year clinical outcomes between small incision lenticular extraction (SMILE) and off-flap epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis (Epi-LASIK) for myopia.Methods:In this retrospective case-control study,choosing from Nanjing General Hospital of PLA between March 2013 and August 2014,103 eyes of 52 patients underwent SMILE,and 86 eyes of 43 patients underwent off-flap Epi-LASIK.Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA),best corrected visual acuity (BCVA),residual astigmatism,and spherical equivalent (SE) were evaluated preoperatively,at 1 day,1 week,at 1,3,and 6 months,and at 1 year postoperatively.Contrast sensitivity (CS),modulation transfer function (MTF),and wavefront aberrations were evaluated at 1 year postoperatively.Data were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance,independent-samples t-tests,and Chi-square tests.Results:At 1 day and 1 week after surgery,the UCVA for the SMILE group was significantly better than for the Epi-LASIK group (t=5.065,5.994,respectively,P＜0.001 for both);however for all other follow-up times,there were no significant differences in the UCVA between the two groups.At 1 year postoperatively,there was no significant difference in the frequency of eyes SE within ±0.5 diopter (D) or within ±1.0 D between the two groups respectively.However,the frequency with which the SMILE group attained a cylindrical refractive error within ±0.5 D was clearly higher than for the Epi-LASIK group (x2=10.734,P=0.001).The CS with glare at lowspatial frequency [3 and 6 cycles per degree (cpd)] in the SMILE group was significantly higher than for the Epi-LASIK group (t=4.106,3.848,P＜0.001).However,there were no significant differences in CS at other spatial frequencies,with or without glare between the two groups.Total order aberrations,lower-order aberrations,higher-order aberrations,spherical aberrations,coma,trefoil aberrations,and MTFs at all spatial frequencies with 4.0-mm pupils were not significantly different between the two groups.However with 6.0-mm pupils,higher-order aberrations and spherical aberrations of the SMILE group were significantly lower than in the Epi-LASIK group (t=3.881,6.843,P＜0.001 each).There were no significant differences in the other aberrations between the two groups.The MTFs were significantly higher in the SMILE group than in the Epi-LASIK group with 6-mm pupils at low and high spatial frequency (5,20,25,30 cpd) (t=3.272,P=0.001;t=2.926,P=0.004;t=3.280,P=0.001;t=3.975,P＜0.001 respectively).There were no significant differences in the MTFs at residual spatial frequency between the two groups.Conclusions:Both SMILE and off-flap Epi-LASIK are safe,efficient,stable,and predictable for the treatment of myopia.However,SMILE had better correction of astigmatic error,and with 6.0-mm pupils,SMILE had better visual quality than off-flap Epi-LASIK.