Randomized study of ureteral catheter versus double-J stent in tubeless MPCNL patients

Yizhou Zhou,Jianguo Zhu,A. Gurioli,Dong-bo Yuan,Jiawei Luo,Zhilin Li,Wei Zhang,Shiwei Xiao,Yong-da Liu
2016-01-01
Abstract:1. Department of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, Guangzhou, China 2. Urology Department, Guizhou Provincial People’s Hospital, Guizhou, China * Zhou and Zhu were co-authors 3. Urology Deparment, Turin University of Studies, Turin, Italy # Corresponding author: Yongda Liu Abstract: Objectve: To prospectively analyze and compare the outcomes of using externalized ureteral catheter (EUC) versus Double-J ureteral stent (DJ) in tubeless minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL). Patients and Methods: A total of 109 patients underwent tubeless MPCNL in our institute and have been enrolled into this study. 56 and 53 patients had EUC and DJ positioning at the conclusion of the procedure, respectively. The two approaches have been compared for operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative visual analogue pain scale (VAS) score, analgesic requirement, stent-related symptoms, hospital stay, degree of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) on the operative side and complications according to the modified Clavien system. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding the mean operative times, mean VAS scores, analgesic requirements, mean hemoglobin drop, mean hospital stay and overall complication rate. However, compared with DJ group, EUC group presented fewer postoperative stent-related symptoms and less occurrence of severe VUR (P<0.05). Conclusion: Positioning EUC in tubeless MPCNL is a safe alternative to DJ in Journal of Endourology © Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. DOI: 10.1089/end.2016.0759 Page 1 of 16
What problem does this paper attempt to address?