Abstract:Aerosols are liquid and solid particles suspended in the atmosphere and have a broad size range; they can cool the Earth by scattering radiation back to space or warm the Earth by absorbing radiation directly. Since the industrial revolution, the loading of aerosols in the Earth's atmosphere has increased significantly, yielding modifications to the Earth's energy budget and further affecting the climate state. Aerosol direct radiative forcing (ADRF), defined as the difference in radiation with and without total or specific aerosols, is an important concept used to describe the direct impact of aerosols on radiation. Accurate quantification of ADRF is the premise for understanding and predicting the Earth's climate state. To improve the estimation and evaluation of ADRF, numerous researchers have dedicated their efforts to developing a series of observations and models in recent decades. However, due to the limited availability of wide spatial and high-precision observations of aerosol optical characteristics, as well as an insufficient model description of aerosol properties and physical and chemical processes, the ADRF uncertainty is still high. This paper first reviews the spatio-temporal distribution of aerosol optical depth (AOD), single scattering albedo (SSA) and corresponding ADRF by using observations and models. The aerosol optical properties and ADRF show distinct discrepancies among various regions due to the impact of anthropogenic emissions and meteorological and climate conditions. In regions with rapid economic development, such as India, AOD demonstrates a long-term increasing trend with higher average values. However, regions influenced by environmental protection policies, such as North America and Europe, show a long-term decreasing trend in AOD, accompanied by lower average values. Based on site observations, most of Europe, North America, Africa, and Asia exhibit a significant long-term increasing trend in SSA. However, in seasons with biomass burning or dust outbreaks, specific regions, such as southern and southwestern China in late autumn and early spring, and northern and northwestern China in spring, exhibit a reduction in SSA. In the future, with the global and regional emissions of aerosols and precursors declining, ADRF is expected to weaken, highlighting the warming effect of greenhouse gases. However, the ADRF trend is closely linked to the present development level and trajectory of each region. Second, we systematically summarize the impacts of the influential factors on the ADRF, considering the AOD, SSA, surface albedo (SA), solar zenith angle (SZA), asymmetry factor (ASY), relative altitude between aerosols and clouds, and relative altitude between different types of aerosols. Subsequently, we proceed to review the sensitivities of ADRF to different influential factors, as well as the contributions of these factors to the overall uncertainty of ADRF, which indicate that ADRF is more sensitive to AOD and SSA while SSA emerges as the most significant source of uncertainty in ADRF due to the larger errors associated with its measurement. It should be noted that the uncertainty caused by SA and ASY cannot be ignored in polluted regions. Finally, from the perspective of observations and models, a brief outlook on improving the accuracy of ADRF evaluation is provided. In the future, advanced observation technologies, such as multi-angle, hyperspectral, polarized remote sensing observations, and precise in-situ measurements, should be developed to obtain more accurate information about the aerosols and environment. Furthermore, we need to properly combine various observations and models, including Earth system models, to improve the simulation of aerosols and their precursors. With improved understanding of aerosol-radiation interactions and refining techniques in observations and model simulations, the evaluation of ADRF will be more accurate.

Interactive comment on “ A review of measurement-based assessment of aerosol direct radiative effect and forcing ” by H . Yu et al

Surprising Similarities in Model and Observational Aerosol Radiative Forcing Estimates

Interactive comment on “ Impacts of aerosol direct effects on tropospheric ozone through changes in atmospheric dynamics and photolysis rates ” by Jia

Interactive comment on “ Understanding meteorological influences on PM 2 . 5 concentrations across China : a temporal and spatial perspective ” by Ziyue

Interactive comment on “ Study on long-term aerosol distribution over the land of East China using MODIS data ” by Q

Interactive comment on “Atmospheric impacts on climatic variability of surface incident solar radiation” by K. Wang et al

Reply to Comments on “boreal Forest BVOCs Exchange: Emissions Versus In-Canopy Sinks” by Anonymous Referee # 1

Substantial Uncertainties in Arctic Aerosol Simulations by Microphysical Processes Within the Global Climate-Aerosol Model CAM-ATRAS

Opinion: The importance of historical and paleoclimate aerosol radiative effects

A Novel Method to Quantify the Uncertainty Contribution of Aerosol-Radiative Interaction Factors

Interactive comment on “ Chemical characterization of aerosols at the summit of Mountain Tai in the middle of central east China ” by C

Responses to the reviewers’ comments for manuscript Size segregated particle number and mass emissions in urban Beijing Title revised to “Size segregated particle number and mass concentrations of emission sources in urban Beijing” according to Reviewer #2’s comment

Interactive comment on “Climatology in Asian dust activation and transport based on MISR satellite observations and trajectory analysis” by

Improved Measurement of Carbonaceous Aerosol in Beijing, China: Intercomparison of Sampling and Thermal-Optical Analysis Methods

Progress of Aerosol Direct Radiative Forcing

On the Characteristics of Aerosol Indirect Effect Based on Dynamic Regimes in Global Climate Models

Interactive comment on “ A revised mineral dust emission scheme in GEOS-Chem : improvements in dust simulations over China ” by Rong Tian et al

Interactive comment on “ Dominant role of emission reduction in PM 2 . 5 air quality improvement in Beijing during 2013 – 2017 : a model-based decomposition analysis ” by Jing

Robust Observational Constraint of Uncertain Aerosol Processes and Emissions in a Climate Model and the Effect on Aerosol Radiative Forcing

Interactive comment on “Influence of aerosol copper on HO2 uptake: A novel parameterized equation” by Huan Song et al

Enhancing Our Vision of Aerosols: Progress in Scattering Phase Function Measurements