Effects of uvr on immune response skin ano evaluation of sunscreen-of

Zhou Hua,Zhu Huigang,Zhang Zhennong
2014-01-01
Abstract:1. It is an important work to monitor the ground leve) UVR, especially fora long time. Tue h..i.._:ghest means UVR irradiate value at noon is observed in July (UV-420, 6814 μW/cm2; UV-365, 31 ~4 μW/cm2) or August (UV-297, 31.5 μW/cm2) at shanghai. The trend showed that radiation powe::.,. of summer > that of autumn > that of spring> that of winter. Tue highest means UVR of a day app~ed around noon. The UVA is nearly I 00 times higher than UVB . 2. Suo protection factor (SPF) is an important index to evaluate the effectiveness of sunscre-.~n. It is urgent to establish the standards on evaluating the efficacy of sunscreen in our country. We • ave set up in vivo and in vitro methods to detect the SPF of sunscreen. 3. Though majority of people realized the harmful effects of UVR, they neglected to pr<>t -.ect themselves from exposure to UVR. 1t is urgent to take some propaganda against UVR. 4. UVA radation has the capacity to damage collagen I and collagen ID. It is believed '-..hat UVA plays a important role in the induction of photodamage of the skin, 5. UVR can suppress immune responses of the skin. Cis-urocanic acid (cis-UCA) has been suggested as a photoreceptor for UV and has been demonstrated to suppress immune responses-... in delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) in mice.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?