A Review of Sunscreen Safety and Efficacy zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA
F. Nash,Gasparro,Francis,M. Mitchnick
Abstract:The use of sunscreen products has been advocated by many health care practitioners as a means to reduce skin damage produced by ultraviolet radiation (UVR) from sunlight. There is a need zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA to better understand the efficacy and safety of sunscreen products given this ongoing campaign encouraging their use. The approach used to establish sunscreen efficacy, sun protection factor zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA (SPF), is a useful assessment of primarily UVB (290-320 nm) filters. The SPF test, however, does not adequately assess the complete photoprotective profile of sunscreens specifically against long wavelength UVAI (340-400 nm). Moreover, to date, there is no singular, agreed upon method for evaluating UVA efficacy despite the immediate and seemingly urgent consumer need to develop sunscreen products that provide broad-spectrum UVB and UVA photoprotection. With regard to the safety of UVB and UVA filters, the current list of commonly used organic and inorganic sunscreens has favorable toxicological profiles based on acute, subchronic and chronic animal or human studies. Further, in most studies, sunscreens have been shown to prevent the damaging effects of UVR exposure. Thus, based on this review of currently available data, it is concluded that sunscreen ingredients or products do not pose a human health concern. Further, the regular use of appropriate broad-spectrum sunscreen products could have a significant and favorable impact on public health as part of an overall strategy to reduce UVR exposure. INTRODUCTION decades (1,2). Exposure to UV radiation (UVR)? from the sun plays a causal role in acute and chronic skin damage including skin cancers (3). As such, the medical community and other health care providers have advocated a photoavoidance strategy consisting of limiting sunlight exposure between midday hours of 1100 and 1500, wearing protective clothing and using sunscreens. Because sunscreens prevent sunburn and their use is encouraged, it has been suggested that sun exposure may actually be prolonged because users believe they are protected and therefore will spend more time in the sun. This potential consequence raises several ancillary concerns. For example, because most sunscreens are primarily UVB (290-320 nm) and, in some cases, short wavelength UVAII (320-340 nm) filters, then use of such products changes the UVR spectrum to which the skin is exposed. Consequently, if behavior is modified by sunscreen use resulting in longer periods of sun exposure, then the dose of long-wavelength UVR, 340 nm and above, would be increased. Further, even though sunscreens prevent sunburn, little is known regarding the threshold or dose-response for UVR-induced effects on other endpoints such as immunosuppression or DNA damage. Finally, because sunscreens are becoming widespread and available, questions have been raised regarding their long-term safety, particularly in the presence of UVR. The intent of this review is to address these concerns, when possible, with direct evidence and discuss ways that sunscreen products might be improved. To this end, it seems necessary to examine some basic concepts regarding the complexities of UVR and its effects on skin. After considering the effects of UVR on unprotected skin, the consequences of introducing sunscreens into this intricate interaction will be reviewed. The incidence of nonmelanoma and melanoma skin cancers has been increasing in most parts of the world for several "To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Dermatology & Cutaneous Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA. Fax: 215-503-3322; e-mail: francis.gasparro@mail.tju.edu zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA
Environmental Science,Medicine