Abstract:The proposed framework optimizes the DWI shells acquisition strategy, enabling the quantification of multiple models within a clinically feasible acquisition time. We tested five popular models, including low b‐values models (free water and IVIM), high b‐values models (DKI and NODDI), and the diffusion tensor model (DTI). Complementary aspects of tissue microstructure can be studied with diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI). However, there is no consensus on how to design a diffusion acquisition protocol for multiple models within a clinically feasible time. The purpose of this study is to provide a flexible framework that is able to optimize the shell acquisition protocol given a set of DWI models. Eleven healthy subjects underwent an extensive DWI acquisition protocol, including 15 candidate shells, ranging from 10 to 3500 s/mm2. The proposed framework aims to determine the optimized acquisition scheme (OAS) with a data‐driven procedure minimizing the squared error of model‐estimated parameters. We tested the proposed method over five heterogeneous DWI models exploiting both low and high b‐values (i.e., diffusion tensor imaging [DTI], free water, intra‐voxel incoherent motion [IVIM], diffusion kurtosis imaging [DKI], and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging [NODDI]). A voxel‐level and region of interest (ROI)‐level analysis was conducted over the white matter and in 48 fiber bundles, respectively. Results showed that acquiring data for the five abovementioned models via OAS requires 14 min, compared with 35 min for the joint recommended acquisition protocol. The parameters derived from the reference acquisition scheme and the OAS are comparable in terms of estimated values, noise, and tissue contrast. Furthermore, the power analysis showed that the OAS retains the potential sensitivity to group‐level differences in the parameters of interest, with the exception of the free water model. Overall, there is a linear correspondence (R2 = 0.91) between OAS and reference‐derived parameters. In conclusion, the proposed framework optimizes the shell acquisition scheme for a given set of DWI models (i.e., DTI, free water, IVIM, DKI, and NODDI), combining low and high b‐values while saving acquisition time.

The Performance of NODDI Estimation Using a Common 2-Shell Protocol

Single-Shell NODDI Using Dictionary Learner Estimated Isotropic Volume Fraction

NODDI: Practical in vivo neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the human brain

NODDI-DTI: Estimating Neurite Orientation and Dispersion Parameters from a Diffusion Tensor in Healthy White Matter

Analysis of the effects of noise, DWI sampling, and value of assumed parameters in diffusion MRI models

NODDI-SH: a computational efficient NODDI extension for fODF estimation in diffusion MRI

Improving Estimation of Fiber Orientations in Diffusion MRI Using Inter-Subject Information Sharing

Bingham–NODDI: Mapping anisotropic orientation dispersion of neurites using diffusion MRI

NODDI in clinical research

NODDI reproducibility and variability with magnetic field strength: A comparison between 1.5 T and 3 T

RobNODDI: Robust NODDI Parameter Estimation with Adaptive Sampling under Continuous Representation

A study of neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging in ischemic stroke.

Angular Resolution Enhancement of Diffusion MRI Data Using Inter-Subject Information Transfer.

Non-central Chi to Gaussian transformation of diffusion MRI signals improves estimation of fiber ODFs

Estimation of Tissue Microstructure Using a Deep Network Inspired by a Sparse Reconstruction Framework

MTE-NODDI: Multi-TE NODDI for disentangling non-T2-weighted signal fractions from compartment-specific T2 relaxation times

A framework for optimizing the acquisition protocol multishell diffusion‐weighted imaging for multimodel assessment

Down-sampling in diffusion MRI: a bundle-specific DTI and NODDI study

Assessing Microstructural Substrates of White Matter Abnormalities: A Comparative Study Using DTI and NODDI

Evaluation of the Influence of Data Sampling Schemes on Neural Diffusion Models

Brain Development From Newborn to Adolescence: Evaluation by Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging