Abstract:Abstract ObjectiveTo explore the clinical application value of ultrasound elastography (UE) technology in the evaluation of the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) at different time-points in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.MethodsTwo group patients were performed conventional ultrasound and elastography examination before NAC (pre-NAC),after the second (post-2nd-NAC), and the fourth cycles of NAC(post-4th-NAC),including 40 cases of 40 breast cancer patients (age range, 25-72 years) in Strain Elastography (SE) group and 21 cases of 20 breast cancer patients (age range,31-67 years) in shear-wave elastography (SWE) group. Changes in elastographic parameters (elasticity grading and strain ratio in SE group, the maximum elastic value and the average elastic value in SWE group) related to tissue biomechanical properties were then determined and compared to clinical and pathologic tumor response after mastectomy. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to examine parameters at SE and SWE to predict pathologic response. ResultsThe difference of the SE scores between the effective and the ineffective group were statistically significant, no matter after the second or fourth cycles of NAC(P = 0.003 and P = 0.002).The efficacy of NAC can be evaluated by SE semi-quantitative method（no matter with normal breast tissue or adipose tissue as reference）(with normal breast tissue as reference: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve(AUC): 0.763 (post-2nd-NAC),0.836 (post-4th-NAC) ; sensitivity:66.7% (post-2nd-NAC) , 83.3% (post-4th-NAC); and specificity:87.5% (post-2nd-NAC) , 87.5% (post-4th-NAC)；with adipose tissue as reference area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.733 (post-2nd-NAC) ,0.775 (post-4th-NAC); sensitivity: 66.7% (post-2nd-NAC) ,87.5% (post-4th-NAC); and specificity: 75% (post-2nd-NAC) , 68.7% (post-4th-NAC)) and SWE quantitative parameters(taking Emean as measurement parameter: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.929 (post-2nd-NAC) ,0.929 (post-4th-NAC); sensitivity:85.7% (post-2nd-NAC), 78.6% (post-4th-NAC); and specificity100% (post-2nd-NAC), 100% (post-4th-NAC);taking Emax as measurement parameter: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.898 (post-2nd-NAC) , 0.908 (post-4th-NAC); sensitivity: 85.7% (post-2nd-NAC) , 71.4% (post-4th-NAC); and specificity100% (post-2nd-NAC), 100% (post-4th-NAC)) after the second and fourth cycles of NAC. There was no significant statistically difference between SE semi-quantitative methods and SWE quantitative parameters in the evaluation of the efficacy of NAC (P =0.082 post-2nd-NAC and 0.324 (post-4th-NAC)). ConclusionBoth SE and SWE can be potentially used as an early predictor of tumor therapy response in locally advanced breast cancer patients, and there was no significant difference in their assessment effectiveness

Application Value of Shear Wave Elastography in the Evaluation of Tumor Downstaging for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

Tumor pathological response and downstaging of locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: comparison of two radiation dose schedules

Use of Shear Wave Elastography in the Evaluation of Local Advanced Rectal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy: the Initial Experience

Application of Ultrasonic Elastography in Preoperative T Staging of Rectal Neoplasm

Application of endorectal elastography to evaluate local advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy:compared with pathology

Endosonography Elastography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Restaging and Response Assessment of Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Therapy

Value of endorectalultrasonography in preoperative assessment of rectal cancer post neoadjuvantchemoradiation therapy

A prospective study on using shear wave elastography to predict the ypT0 stage of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: a new support for the watch-and-wait approach?

Application of Transrectal Elastography and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Evaluation of the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer

Shear Wave Elastography in Rectal Cancer Staging, Compared with Endorectal Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Clinical Value of Endorectal Ultrasonography in Predicting Neoadjuvant Treatment Response for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

The predictive value of tumor volume reduction ratio on three-dimensional endorectal ultrasound for tumor response to chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer

Repeated Endorectal Ultrasonographies Predict the Tumor Response of Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy in Rectal Cancer

Use of Sequential Endorectal US to Predict the Tumor Response of Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer.

Application and Influencing Factors of Endorectal Ultrasound in T-stage Restaging of Rectal Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Therapy

[Clinical Value of Radial Endorectal Ultrasound in the Assessment of Preoperative Staging of Rectal Carcinoma].

Value and progress of endorectal ultrasound in the treatment decision of rectal cancer

Shear-wave elastography predicts T-restaging and pathologic complete response of rectal cancer post neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

The value of endoscopic ultrasound in the preoperative staging for advanced rectal cancer

Application value of different sequences magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer re-staging after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy

The efficacy of strain elastography and shear-wave elastography in the evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced breast cancer