Reply to “comment on ‘piezoelectricity in Planar Boron Nitride Via a Geometric Phase' ”

Jie Li,Yunhua Wang,Zongtan Wang,Jie Tan,Biao Wang,Yulan Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.98.167404
2018-01-01
Abstract:Using the strain-dependent effective Hamiltonian and the geometric phase, Droth et al. [Phys. Rev. B 94, 075404 (2016)] obtain an analytical expression for the electronic contribution to the piezoelectricity of planar hexagonal boron nitride (h -BN). Their analytical results of piezoelectric constants for h -BN are invalid because of the mistakes in constructing the adiabatic process of the piezoelectricity. In this comment, we reconstruct a proper adiabatic process for piezoelectricity and formulate a general Berry phase expression for the piezoelectric coefficients of two-dimensional piezoelectric crystals by means of the modern theory of polarization. The corrected analytical results of the piezoelectric constants are in complete consistency with the first-principles calculations and hence manifest the validity and generality of the Berry phase expression of piezoelectric coefficients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?