Abstract:Differential privacy (DP), as a rigorous mathematical definition quantifying privacy leakage, has become a well-accepted standard for privacy protection. Combined with powerful machine learning (ML) techniques, differentially private machine learning (DPML) is increasingly important. As the most classic DPML algorithm, DP-SGD incurs a significant loss of utility, which hinders DPML's deployment in practice. Many studies have recently proposed improved algorithms based on DP-SGD to mitigate utility loss. However, these studies are isolated and cannot comprehensively measure the performance of improvements proposed in algorithms. More importantly, there is a lack of comprehensive research to compare improvements in these DPML algorithms across utility, defensive capabilities, and generalizability. We fill this gap by performing a holistic measurement of improved DPML algorithms on utility and defense capability against membership inference attacks (MIAs) on image classification tasks. We first present a taxonomy of where improvements are located in the ML life cycle. Based on our taxonomy, we jointly perform an extensive measurement study of the improved DPML algorithms, over twelve algorithms, four model architectures, four datasets, two attacks, and various privacy budget configurations. We also cover state-of-the-art label differential privacy (Label DP) algorithms in the evaluation. According to our empirical results, DP can effectively defend against MIAs, and sensitivity-bounding techniques such as per-sample gradient clipping play an important role in defense. We also explore some improvements that can maintain model utility and defend against MIAs more effectively. Experiments show that Label DP algorithms achieve less utility loss but are fragile to MIAs. ML practitioners may benefit from these evaluations to select appropriate algorithms. To support our evaluation, we implement a modular re-usable software, DPMLBench,(1) which enables sensitive data owners to deploy DPML algorithms and serves as a benchmark tool for researchers and practitioners.

Utility-aware Exponential Mechanism for Personalized Differential Privacy.

AdaPDP: Adaptive Personalized Differential Privacy.

UPA: an Automated, Accurate and Efficient Differentially Private Big-Data Mining System

Data-Driven Optimization for Utility Providers with Differential Privacy of Users' Energy Profile

PEM: A Practical Differentially Private System for Large-Scale Cross-Institutional Data Mining.

DPMLBench: Holistic Evaluation of Differentially Private Machine Learning

Mean Estimation of Numerical Data Under (ε,δ) -Utility-Optimized Local Differential Privacy

A Utility-Optimized Framework for Personalized Private Histogram Estimation

Mean Estimation of Numerical Data under (ϵ, Δ)-Utility-optimized Local Differential Privacy

Dynamic Private Task Assignment under Differential Privacy

LDPTube: Theoretical Utility Benchmark and Enhancement for LDP Mechanisms in High-dimensional Space

Utility-aware Privacy Perturbation for Training Data

TPMDP: Threshold Personalized Multi-party Differential Privacy via Optimal Gaussian Mechanism

Beyond Statistical Estimation: Differentially Private Individual Computation via Shuffling

DP-EM: Differentially Private Expectation Maximization

Bounded and Unbiased Composite Differential Privacy

Not one but many Tradeoffs: Privacy Vs. Utility in Differentially Private Machine Learning

Probabilistic Matrix Factorization with Personalized Differential Privacy

Privacy accounting $\varepsilon$conomics: Improving differential privacy composition via a posteriori bounds

A proposal to increase data utility on Global Differential Privacy data based on data use predictions

Privacy-Preserving Utility Verification of the Data Published by Non-Interactive Differentially Private Mechanisms.