Abstract:The performance of the discontinuous Galerkin (DG) method and the continuous streamline upwind Petrov-Galerkin (SUPG) method in the computation of steady viscoelastic flows have been compared in this paper. For the continuous SUPG method it is necessary to include the elastic-viscous-split-stress (EVSS) formulation to satisfy the compatibility requirement on the velocity-stress interpolation (SUPG/EVSS), while for the discontinuous Galerkin method both the pure mixed formulation (DG/MIX) and the EVSS formulation (DG/EVSS) have been tested. We first examine a benchmark smooth problem, i.e. the steady flow of an upper convected Maxwell (UCM) fluid around a sphere falling along the axis of a cylindrical tube, by using high-order finite element approximation. DG/MIX is found not to be a stable discretization in this problem, its limiting Weissenberg number decreases with increasing the interpolation order, on the other hand, DG/EVSS is an accurate and stable algorithm, its solution converges as the approximation order increases (the so-called p-convergence) and it produces almost identical stress boundary layers to that of the SUPG/EVSS algorithm at a Weissenberg number as high as 2.0. To explore benefits of the discontinuous interpolation for the stress in the DG method, we further examine two benchmark problems with stress singularities by using low-order interpolations on sufficiently fine meshes; they are the axisymmetric steady flows of the modified Chilcott and Rallison (MCR) fluid through a four-to-one abrupt contraction and in a tube with the stick-to-slip transition in the wall velocity boundary condition. In the contraction problem the DG/EVSS method is found to be a significant improvement over the SUPG/EVSS method, quality of the solutions is better for DG/EVSS and a much higher Weissenberg number limit is observed. In the stick-slip problem both DG/EVSS and SUPG/EVSS are very robust, they confront no limit of the Weissenberg number and predict asymptotic stress profiles as the number becomes sufficiently large. In both problems the pure mixed method DG/MIX produces severe stress oscillations near the singularities and fails to converge at medium Weissenberg numbers.

A Unified Study of Continuous and Discontinuous Galerkin Methods

N A ] 2 4 A pr 2 01 8 A Unified Study of Conforming and Discontinuous Galerkin Methods ∗

A Coupled Continuous and Discontinuous Finite Element Method for the Incompressible Flows

Implementation of the Continuous-Discontinuous Galerkin Finite Element Method

New Discontinuous Galerkin Algorithms and Analysis for Linear Elasticity with Symmetric Stress Tensor

Coupling of Finite Element Method and Discontinuous Galerkin Method to Simulate Viscoelastic Flows

Discontinuous Galerkin Method for Level Set Equation on Unstructured Grids

Discontinuous Galerkin Isogeometric Analysis of Convection Problem on Surface

Investigation on Implicit Discontinuous Galerkin Method in Unsteady Flow

The continuous Galerkin finite element methods for linear neutral delay differential equations.

A Comparative Study of the Discontinuous Galerkin and Continuous SUPG Finite Element Methods for Computation of Viscoelastic Flows

Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Solving a Hyperbolic Inequality

Convergence analysis of novel discontinuous Galerkin methods for a convection dominated problem

Numerical Solutions of Convection-Diffusion Equations by Hybrid Discontinuous Galerkin Methods

Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Hemivariational Inequalities in Contact Mechanics

Analysis of Two Discontinuous Galerkin Finite Element Methods for the Total Pressure Formulation of Linear Poroelasticity Model

Numerical Analysis Of The Unconditionally Stable Discontinuous Galerkin Schemes For The Nonstationary Conduction-Convection Problem

A class of Discontinuous Galerkin methods for nonlinear variational problems

N A ] 2 2 A ug 2 01 9 Extended Galerkin Method ∗

Efficient Time Discretization for Exploring Spatial Superconvergence of Discontinuous Galerkin Methods