A Comparative Study of the Discontinuous Galerkin and Continuous SUPG Finite Element Methods for Computation of Viscoelastic Flows

YR Fan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0045-7825(96)01102-4
IF: 6.588
1997-01-01
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
Abstract:The performance of the discontinuous Galerkin (DG) method and the continuous streamline upwind Petrov-Galerkin (SUPG) method in the computation of steady viscoelastic flows have been compared in this paper. For the continuous SUPG method it is necessary to include the elastic-viscous-split-stress (EVSS) formulation to satisfy the compatibility requirement on the velocity-stress interpolation (SUPG/EVSS), while for the discontinuous Galerkin method both the pure mixed formulation (DG/MIX) and the EVSS formulation (DG/EVSS) have been tested. We first examine a benchmark smooth problem, i.e. the steady flow of an upper convected Maxwell (UCM) fluid around a sphere falling along the axis of a cylindrical tube, by using high-order finite element approximation. DG/MIX is found not to be a stable discretization in this problem, its limiting Weissenberg number decreases with increasing the interpolation order, on the other hand, DG/EVSS is an accurate and stable algorithm, its solution converges as the approximation order increases (the so-called p-convergence) and it produces almost identical stress boundary layers to that of the SUPG/EVSS algorithm at a Weissenberg number as high as 2.0. To explore benefits of the discontinuous interpolation for the stress in the DG method, we further examine two benchmark problems with stress singularities by using low-order interpolations on sufficiently fine meshes; they are the axisymmetric steady flows of the modified Chilcott and Rallison (MCR) fluid through a four-to-one abrupt contraction and in a tube with the stick-to-slip transition in the wall velocity boundary condition. In the contraction problem the DG/EVSS method is found to be a significant improvement over the SUPG/EVSS method, quality of the solutions is better for DG/EVSS and a much higher Weissenberg number limit is observed. In the stick-slip problem both DG/EVSS and SUPG/EVSS are very robust, they confront no limit of the Weissenberg number and predict asymptotic stress profiles as the number becomes sufficiently large. In both problems the pure mixed method DG/MIX produces severe stress oscillations near the singularities and fails to converge at medium Weissenberg numbers.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?