A Remark on Our Paper "negative Holomorphic Curvature and Positive Canonical Bundle"

Damin Wu,Shing-Tung Yau
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4310/cag.2016.v24.n4.a9
2016-01-01
Communications in Analysis and Geometry
Abstract:This is a continuation of our first paper in [WY16]. There are two purposes of this paper: One is to give a proof of the main result in [WY16] without going through the argument depending on numerical effectiveness. The other one is to provide a proof of our conjecture, mentioned in [TY], where the assumption of negative holomorphic sectional curvature is dropped to quasi-negative. We should note that a solution to our conjecture is also provided by Diverio-Trapani [DT]. Both proofs depend on our argument in [WY16]. But our argument here makes use of the argument given by the second author and Cheng in [CY75].
What problem does this paper attempt to address?