Abstract:In ages of rapid changes and growing competitiveness, innovation is considered as the primary driver for firms to keep sustainable competitiveness, achieve technological catch-up and continue growing beyond catching-up. From the standpoint of firms, organizational learning is a crucial path toward innovation. Organizational learning is required not only to take full advantage of the existing knowledge stock, but also to explore new knowledge and technological opportunities. The former is exploitative learning based on existing knowledge, and the latter is explorative learning oriented to new knowledge and techniques. However, exploitative learning and explorative learning tap into totally different organizational routines and management behavior. Due to the finite resources and capabilities, firms face the dilemma between exploitative and explorative learning. How to organize explorative and exploitative learning in a reasonable manner is the key solution for firms to build efficient and effective R&D systems. Compared with firms in developed country, Chinese firms face constraints, such as scarce resources, imperfect market infrastructure,poor innovation capability and insufficient advanced knowledge. Thus, the trade-off between explorative learning and exploitative learning becomes more challenging. Chinese firms need to learn how to rationally allocate limited resources in ambidextrous learning so as to maximize the innovation performance. Scholars hold different opinions on whether innovation performance could benefit from ambidextrous learning. In addition, internal contextual factor is the carrier of ambidextrous learning which deserves attention. The role of internal contextual factors in the ambidextrous learning and the innovation mechanism need further exploration and validation. Therefore, to investigate the mechanism of ambidextrous learning in innovation performance is important for both practices and theory building. In this research, we investigate some global semiconductor companies listed in America. The patent data of these firms between 1991 and 2000 are collected and analyzed with the help of multiple techniques. Based on a view of knowledge, this research discusses two mechanisms of ambidextrous learning in innovation performance, respectively combined ambidextrous learning and balanced ambidextrous learning. The empirical results show that combined ambidextrous learning positively improves firms' innovation performance,while balanced ambidextrous learning negatively reduces innovation performance. In addition,this research adopts a micro-level lens and claims that internal contextual factors are fundamental factors for the mechanism of ambidextrous learning and innovation performance. As a significant contextual factor,an intra-organizational R&D collaboration network is constructed by using patent citation. The empirical research shows that the density of intra-organizational R&D collaboration network significantly moderates the mechanism of ambidextrous learning in innovation performance. When intra-organizational collaboration network gets higher, the positive influence of combined ambidextrous learning would be weakens,and the negative influence of balanced ambidextrous learning s deteriorates. Based on the boundary of organizational cognition, this research seeks new methods to evaluate exploitative or explorative learning, which to some extent helps explain the inconsistency in existing literature. The empirical result implicates that the pursuit of the balance between exploitative learning and explorative learning is not the best solution. An adjustment on each proportion according to different strategic orientations is necessary. Furthermore, this research focuses on the importance of internal contextual factors. By calculating the density of intra-organizational network, this research provides a theoretical foundation and practical guide for the construction of R&D collaboration networks.

The Study about Organizational Mode for Radical Innovation

Open-Disruptive Innovation: an Avenue for Developing Countries' Independent Innovation

The Study On Organizational Sustainable Innovation Based On Habitual Domains Theory

THE MODERATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE IN INNOVATION: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA.

The Research on the Industrial Organization Model of Radical Innovation Based High-tech Industries

When R&D Spending Is Not Enough: The Critical Role Of Culture When You Really Want To Innovate

An empirical multi-level analysis for achieving balance between incremental and radical innovations

Strategic Leadership, Ambidextrous Learning and Organizational Innovation：An Exploration of a Theoretical Model

The relationship among strategic orientation, willingness to cannibalize, and radical product innovation performance

Incremental versus Radical Innovation and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: A Moderated Mediation Model

Study on Manager Competency and Its Impact on Technological Innovation Mode

Organizing for Radical Innovation: An Exploratory Study of the Structural Aspects of RI Management Systems in Large Established Firms

The mechanism of technological innovation in the environment of knowledge agglomeration and uncertainty

Research on Organizational Innovation of Manufacturing Enterprises: Case Study of Innovation Model of Midea Group

Innovation As a Differentiation Strategy: Its Differential Substitution Effects on Corporate Social Responsibility

The Mechanism of Ambidextrous Learning in Innovation Performance: The Moderating Effect of Intra-organizational Collaboration Network

Ambidextrous Management of A Large, Complex Engineering Project with Significant Innovations-Case Study of the Sutong Bridge Project

A Study on the ALL-involvement Innovation of Enterprise and Organizational Mechanisms

Rethinking organizational learning orientation on radical and incremental innovation in high-tech firms

Product Development as Core Competence: How Formal Product Development Practices Differ for Radical, More Innovative, and Incremental Product Innovations

Innovation Ambidexterity and Knowledge Redundancy: the Moderating Effects of Transactional Leadership.