Abstract:Mediation analysis plays an important role in understanding causal processes in social and behavioral sciences. While path analysis with composite scores was criticized to yield biased parameter estimates when variables contain measurement errors, recent literature has pointed out that the population values of parameters of latent-variable models are determined by the subjectively assigned scales of the latent variables. Thus, conclusions in existing studies comparing structural equation modeling (SEM) and path analysis with weighted composites (PAWC) on the accuracy and precision of the estimates of the indirect effect in mediation analysis have little validity. Instead of comparing the size on estimates of the indirect effect between SEM and PAWC, this article compares parameter estimates by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), which does not depend on the metrics of the latent variables once the anchors of the latent variables are determined. Results show that PAWC yields greater SNR than SEM in estimating and testing the indirect effect even when measurement errors exist. In particular, path analysis via factor scores almost always yields greater SNRs than SEM. Mediation analysis with equally weighted composites (EWCs) also more likely yields greater SNRs than SEM. Consequently, PAWC is statistically more efficient and more powerful than SEM in conducting mediation analysis in empirical research. The article also further studies conditions that cause SEM to have smaller SNRs, and results indicate that the advantage of PAWC becomes more obvious when there is a strong relationship between the predictor and the mediator, whereas the size of the prediction error in the mediator adversely affects the performance of the PAWC methodology. Results of a real-data example also support the conclusions.

Total-effect test is superfluous for establishing mediation in the classic mediation model

TOTAL-EFFECT TEST IS SUPERFLUOUS FOR ESTABLISHING COMPLEMENTARY MEDIATION

Total-effect Test May Erroneously Reject So-called "full" or "complete" Mediation

Mediation Analysis and Effect Size Measurement： Retrospect and Prospect

When the test of mediation is more powerful than the test of the total effect

Decomposition of the Total Effect for Two Mediators: A Natural Counterfactual Interaction Effect Framework

Power of Testing for Exposure Effects under Incomplete Mediation

C’ Test Helps or Hinders? -- Clarifying the Communication Fallacy of “Effect To Be Mediated” In Marketing Research

Improving Precision in Mediation Analysis Through Efficient Use of Case Data

Equivalence of Two Least-Squares Estimators for Indirect Effects

Efficient Adjusted Joint Significance Test and Sobel-Type Confidence Interval for Mediation Effect

The Impact of Measurement Error and Omitting Confounders on Statistical Inference of Mediation Effects and Tools for Sensitivity Analysis

Clarifying causal mediation analysis for the applied researcher: Defining effects based on what we want to learn

Causal Mediation Analysis in the Context of Clinical Research.

Testing Mediation Effects Using Logic of Boolean Matrices

Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis

Testing High-Dimensional Mediation Effect with Arbitrary Exposure-Mediator Coefficients

The measurement of the mediator and its influence on statistical mediation conclusions.

Clinically Relevant Mediation Analysis using Controlled Indirect Effect

Signal-to-Noise Ratio in Estimating and Testing the Mediation Effect: Structural Equation Modeling versus Path Analysis with Weighted Composites

The use of traditional and causal estimators for mediation models with a binary outcome and exposure-mediator interaction