Abstract:The incorporation of causal inference in mediation analysis has led to theoretical and methodological advancements -- effect definitions with causal interpretation, clarification of assumptions required for effect identification, and an expanding array of options for effect estimation. However, the literature on these results is fast-growing and complex, which may be confusing to researchers unfamiliar with causal inference or unfamiliar with mediation. The goal of this paper is to help ease the understanding and adoption of causal mediation analysis. It starts by highlighting a key difference between the causal inference and traditional approaches to mediation analysis and making a case for the need for explicit causal thinking and the causal inference approach in mediation analysis. It then explains in as-plain-as-possible language existing effect types, paying special attention to motivating these effects with different types of research questions, and using concrete examples for illustration. This presentation differentiates two perspectives (or purposes of analysis): the explanatory perspective (aiming to explain the total effect) and the interventional perspective (asking questions about hypothetical interventions on the exposure and mediator, or hypothetically modified exposures). For the latter perspective, the paper proposes tapping into a general class of interventional effects that contains as special cases most of the usual effect types -- interventional direct and indirect effects, controlled direct effects and also a generalized interventional direct effect type, as well as the total effect and overall effect. This general class allows flexible effect definitions which better match many research questions than the standard interventional direct and indirect effects.

Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects.

Mediation Analysis and Effect Size Measurement： Retrospect and Prospect

R2 effect-size measures for mediation analysis

The Measurement and Communication of Effect Sizes in Management Research

Statistical properties of four effect-size measures for mediation models

Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models

Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions

Clarifying causal mediation analysis for the applied researcher: Defining effects based on what we want to learn

A simulation study of mediated effect measures

Increasing statistical power in mediation models without increasing sample size

Required sample size to detect the mediated effect

Causal mediation analysis: From simple to more robust strategies for estimation of marginal natural (in)direct effects

Equivalence of Two Least-Squares Estimators for Indirect Effects

Improving Precision in Mediation Analysis Through Efficient Use of Case Data

The Impact of Measurement Error and Omitting Confounders on Statistical Inference of Mediation Effects and Tools for Sensitivity Analysis

The measurement of the mediator and its influence on statistical mediation conclusions.

Handling Measurement Error and Omitted Confounders Considering Informativeness of the Confounding Effect under Mediation Modeling

Determining Power and Sample Size for Simple and Complex Mediation Models

A systematic framework for defining R-squared measures in mediation analysis.

Indirect Effects in Sequential Mediation Models: Evaluating Methods for Hypothesis Testing and Confidence Interval Formation

Clinically Relevant Mediation Analysis using Controlled Indirect Effect