Abstract:Abstract Background Data sharing is considered a crucial part of modern medical research. Unfortunately, despite its advantages, it often faces obstacles, especially data privacy challenges. As a result, various approaches and infrastructures have been developed that aim to ensure that patients and research participants remain anonymous when data is shared. However, privacy protection typically comes at a cost, e.g. restrictions regarding the types of analyses that can be performed on shared data. What is lacking is a systematization making the trade-offs taken by different approaches transparent. The aim of the work described in this paper was to develop a systematization for the degree of privacy protection provided and the trade-offs taken by different data sharing methods. Based on this contribution, we categorized popular data sharing approaches and identified research gaps by analyzing combinations of promising properties and features that are not yet supported by existing approaches. Methods The systematization consists of different axes. Three axes relate to privacy protection aspects and were adopted from the popular Five Safes Framework: (1) safe data, addressing privacy at the input level, (2) safe settings, addressing privacy during shared processing, and (3) safe outputs, addressing privacy protection of analysis results. Three additional axes address the usefulness of approaches: (4) support for de-duplication, to enable the reconciliation of data belonging to the same individuals, (5) flexibility, to be able to adapt to different data analysis requirements, and (6) scalability, to maintain performance with increasing complexity of shared data or common analysis processes. Results Using the systematization, we identified three different categories of approaches: distributed data analyses, which exchange anonymous aggregated data, secure multi-party computation protocols, which exchange encrypted data, and data enclaves, which store pooled individual-level data in secure environments for access for analysis purposes. We identified important research gaps, including a lack of approaches enabling the de-duplication of horizontally distributed data or providing a high degree of flexibility. Conclusions There are fundamental differences between different data sharing approaches and several gaps in their functionality that may be interesting to investigate in future work. Our systematization can make the properties of privacy-preserving data sharing infrastructures more transparent and support decision makers and regulatory authorities with a better understanding of the trade-offs taken.

Privacy preserving federated big data analysis

Privacy Preserving Distributed DBSCAN Clustering

Federated Patient Hashing.

Federated Statistical Analysis: Non-parametric Testing and Quantile Estimation

The long-term growth and development of children exposed to Depo-Provera during pregnancy or lactation.

Privacy-Preserving Methods for Vertically Partitioned Incomplete Data

Federated Learning Approach to Protect Healthcare Data over Big Data Scenario

Systematic Review of Privacy-Preserving Distributed Machine Learning From Federated Databases in Health Care

Federated Learning for Privacy-Preserving Medical Data Analytics in Big Data

Privacy-Preserving Workflow for the Cross-Border Federated Analysis of Clinical Data

Privacy-Preserving Federated Heavy Hitter Analytics for Non-IID Data

Enabling privacy-preserving medication analysis in distributed EHR systems

Federated Extra-Trees with Privacy Preserving

Federated Graph Analytics with Differential Privacy

Effect of sham feeding on gastric motor activity of the dog.

Privacy-Aware Compression for Federated Data Analysis

Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning Algorithms for Big Data Systems

Privacy Preservation in Multi-Cloud Secure Data Fusion for Infectious-Disease Analysis

Distributed Modelling Approaches for Data Privacy Preserving

Facilitating Federated Genomic Data Analysis by Identifying Record Correlations while Ensuring Privacy

Privacy-preserving data sharing infrastructures for medical research: systematization and comparison