The efficacy and toxicity of metronomic oral vinorelbine monotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

Xu Ke,Liu Tao,Zhang Jie,Zhou Yangang,Yang Fang,Ren Tao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-020-01707-9
2020-01-01
International Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of metronomic oral vinorelbine monotherapy in patients with stage IIIB/IV and advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Wanfang, and CNKI databases were searched for relevant studies. The overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and incidence of severe adverse events (grade ≥ 3 adverse events; grade 3/4 AEs) were calculated using the methods of merging ratios and means. Merged ratios and means and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to descriptively analyze the efficacy and toxicity of metronomic oral vinorelbine monotherapy in patients with stage IIIB/IV and advanced NSCLC. The ORR and DCR achieved with metronomic oral vinorelbine monotherapy were 12% (95% CI 5–20) and 48% (95% CI 38–59), respectively. Median PFS and OS were 3.46 months (95% CI 2.49–4.43) and 8.22 months (95% CI 7.21–9.24), respectively. The incidence of grade 3/4 AEs was 16% (95% CI 10–22). The more common grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia 9% (95% CI 2–20) and leukopenia 8% (95% CI 1–19). Metronomic oral vinorelbine monotherapy has a certain effect on patients with stage IIIB/IV and advanced NSCLC, especially for untreated elderly patients. It offers the advantages of convenience, lower cost and acceptable incidence of severe adverse events.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?