Cross-efficiency evaluation based on ideal and anti-ideal decision making units

WangYing-Ming,ChinKwai-Sang,LuoYing

IF: 8.5

2011-01-01

Expert Systems with Applications

Abstract:Cross-efficiency evaluation is an effective approach to ranking decision making units (DMUs) that utilize multiple inputs to produce multiple outputs. Its models can usually be developed in a way t...

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Improved DEA Cross Efficiency Evaluation Method Based on Ideal and Anti-Ideal Points

Qiang Hou,Meiou Wang,Xue Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1604298

IF: 1.4

2018-01-01

Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society

Abstract:A new model is introduced in the process of evaluating efficiency value of decision making units (DMUs) through data envelopment analysis (DEA) method. Two virtual DMUs called ideal point DMU and anti-ideal point DMU are combined to form a comprehensive model based on the DEA method. The ideal point DMU is taking self-assessment system according to efficiency concept. The anti-ideal point DMU is taking other-assessment system according to fairness concept. The two distinctive ideal point models are introduced to the DEA method and combined through using variance ration. From the new model, a reasonable result can be obtained. Numerical examples are provided to illustrate the new constructed model and certify the rationality of the constructed model through relevant analysis with the traditional DEA model.

mathematics, interdisciplinary applications,multidisciplinary sciences
A Cross-Efficiency Evaluation Method Based on Evaluation Criteria Balanced on Interval Weights

Hailiu Shi,Yingming Wang,Xiaoming Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11121503

2019-12-11

Symmetry

Abstract:Cross-efficiency evaluation approaches and common set of weights (CSW) approaches have long been suggested as two of the more important and effective methods for the ranking of decision making units (DMUs) in data envelopment analysis (DEA). The former emphasizes the flexibility of evaluation and its weights are asymmetric, while the latter focuses on the standardization of evaluation and its weights are symmetrical. As a compromise between these two approaches, this paper proposes a cross-efficiency evaluation method that is based on two types of flexible evaluation criteria balanced on interval weights. The evaluation criteria can be regarded as macro policy—or means of regulation—according to the industry’s current situation. Unlike current cross-efficiency evaluation methods, which tend to choose the set of weights for peer evaluation based on certain preferences, the cross-efficiency evaluation method based on evaluation criterion determines one set of input and output weights for each DMU. This is done by minimizing the difference between the weights of the DMU and the evaluation criteria, thus ensuring that the cross-evaluation of all DMUs for evaluating peers is as consistent as possible. This method also eliminates prejudice and arbitrariness from peer evaluations. As a result, the proposed cross-efficiency evaluation method not only looks for non-zero weights, but also ranks efficient DMUs completely. The proposed DEA model can be further extended to seek a common set of weights for all DMUs. Numerical examples are provided to illustrate the applications of the cross-efficiency evaluation method based on evaluation criterion in DEA ranking.
A new cross-efficiency ranking method in group decision making environment

Meiqin Wu,Xiaoqing Hou,Jianping Fan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/jifs-210279

2021-09-15

Abstract:As an extended model of data envelopment analysis (DEA), cross-efficiency is utilized in various fields. It applies the relative evaluation values of homogeneous decision-making units (DMUs) in ranking completely. Due to the non-uniqueness of DEA optimal weights, and the cross-efficiency methods focus on the aggregation of cross-efficiency matrix values. There is a low correction between the final efficiency evaluation value and the value assigned to the criteria weight or the value of the criteria. This paper uses the modified aggressive cross-efficiency model to calculate the weights of the decision-making units (DMUs). Then according to the consistency of peer-evaluation criteria, the entropy weight method is used to aggregate the index weights to generate a set of common weights, and a new Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to Compromise Solution (MARCOS) method is used to calculate the utility score of DMUs that can rank them completely. Finally, a numerical case of supplier selection is offered to illustrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method.
A neutral cross-efficiency evaluation method based on interval reference points in consideration of bounded rational behavior

Hai-Liu Shi,Sheng-Qun Chen,Lei Chen,Ying-Ming Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.08.055

IF: 6.4

2021-05-01

European Journal of Operational Research

Abstract:Cross-efficiency evaluation methods have long been suggested as an alternative for the ranking of decision making units (DMUs) in data envelopment analysis (DEA). So far, little research on cross-efficiency evaluation takes the bounded rationality of DMUs into account. In this paper, we propose a neutral cross-efficiency evaluation method based on interval reference points (IRPs) to consider bounded rational behavior. As such, we take the prospect value, which reflects the bounded rationality of DMUs when facing gain and loss, as secondary goals. This approach allows us to determine the input and output weights for each DMU from its own point of view. Each reference point (RP) of the prospect value is defined as an elastic interval reference point (IRP), which can degenerate into a precise reference point (PRP) or an IRP by adjusting the parameters. As a result, the proposed cross-efficiency evaluation method not only takes the bounded rational behavior of DMUs into account, but is also more neutral and flexible. Numerical examples are provided to illustrate the applications of the cross-efficiency evaluation method based on IRPs in DEA ranking.

operations research & management science
Cross‐efficiency evaluation method based on the conservative point of view

Jiasen Sun,Jie Wu,Yingming Wang,Lei Li,Yuhong Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12336

IF: 3.3

2018-08-16

Expert Systems

Abstract:Abstract Traditional cross‐efficiency evaluation models have ignored the problem that large differences may exist among cross‐efficiencies, which may make decision making units (DMUs) unwilling to accept cross‐efficiency evaluation results. Aimed at solving this problem, this paper proposes an altruism cross‐efficiency model based on the conservative point of view. Compared with other cross‐efficiency evaluation models, the proposed model mainly exhibits the following advantages. First, the proposed model no longer guarantees the DMU's self‐evaluation efficiency, allowing the self‐evaluation efficiency to adaptively change. Therefore, the peer‐evaluation process is flexible and adaptable to the actual situation. Second, the proposed model abandons the traditional max‐average secondary objective function and proposes to use a max–min objective function. Thus, the proposed model can maximize the peer‐efficiency of the worst performing peer‐DMU, achieving the effects of reducing the gaps among cross‐efficiencies. Third, the cross‐efficiency evaluation model is based on the conservative point of view, which helps the DMU to distinguish potential competitors among peer‐DMUs. Lastly, to solve the non‐linear model proposed in this paper, the algorithm is designed to describe how to solve the model. The case of a flexible manufacturing system is used to show the appropriateness of the suggested model and algorithm.

computer science, artificial intelligence, theory & methods
Cross-efficiency Evaluation in Data Envelopment Analysis Based on Prospect Theory

Hui-hui Liu,Yao-yao Song,Guo-liang Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.07.046

IF: 6.4

2018-01-01

European Journal of Operational Research

Abstract:Cross-efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a useful tool in evaluating the performance of decision-making units (DMUs). It is generally assumed that decision makers (DMs) are completely rational in common cross-efficiency evaluation models, which fail to consider the DM's risk attitude that plays an important role in the evaluation process. To fill this gap, we investigate the cross-efficiency evaluation in DEA based on prospect theory. First, we introduce a prospect value of the DMU to capture the non-rational psychological aspects of a DM under risk. Second, based on the prospect value, we propose a new cross-efficiency model termed the prospect cross-efficiency (PCE) model. Particularly, some existing cross-efficiency evaluation models can be deemed as the special cases of the PCE model with suitable adjustments of the parameters. Furthermore, this paper provides an empirical example to evaluate cross-efficiency with several selected universities directly managed by the Ministry of Education of China to illustrate the effectiveness of the PCE model in ranking DMUs. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Improving the evaluation of cross efficiencies: A method based on Shannon entropy weight

Malin Song,Qingyuan Zhu,Jun Peng,Ernesto D.R. Santibanez Gonzalez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.07.023

2017-10-01

Abstract:Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a non-parametric statistical method used to assess the production frontiers of decision-making units (DMUs) and evaluate their relative efficiencies. However, using traditional DEA models to evaluate efficiency has certain deficiencies. For example, some DMUs cannot be ranked fully using traditional DEA models. To solve such problems, the cross-efficiency evaluation method has been proposed to replace the self-evaluation system. Nevertheless, this method, which uses a mutual evaluation system to overcome the ranking issue, still has shortcomings such as non-unique cross efficiency weights, which may result in multiple cross efficiency values. Further, providing adequate performance improvement tools to decision makers is difficult using only the average efficiency values. To address the problems of uniqueness and aggregation, this study proposes two cross efficiency models, designated MAX and MIN models. The self-evaluated optimal weight of a certain DMU derived from these MAX and MIN models can maximize or minimize the efficiency of the DMU to form two cross efficiency matrices, which can partially solve the problem that results from multiple optimal weights. To solve the aggregation problem of cross efficiency, the study also applies Shannon entropy, which classifies all cross efficiency values into one group of acquired common objective weights to avoid subjective factors. Finally, the present study confirms an improvement when using the proposed method by examining production data on 15 thermoelectric enterprises in China.

computer science, interdisciplinary applications,engineering, industrial
Algorithms for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making and Efficiency Analysis Problems

Fuh-Hwa Franklin Liu,Su-Chuan Shih

2024-06-10

Abstract:Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems involve the evaluation of alternatives based on various minimization and maximization criteria. Similarly, efficiency evaluation (EA) methods assess decision-making units (DMUs) by analyzing their input consumption and output production. MCDM and EA methods face challenges in managing alternatives and DMUs with varying capacities across different criteria (inputs and outputs). That leads to performance assessments often skewed by subjective biases in criteria weighting. We introduce two innovative scenarios utilizing linear programming-based Virtual Gap Analysis (VGA) models to address these limitations. This dual-scenario approach aims to mitigate traditional biases, offering robust solutions for comprehensively assessing alternatives and DMUs. Our methodology allows for the influential ranking of alternatives in MCDM problems and enables each DMU to adjust its input and output ratios to achieve efficiency.

Optimization and Control
A cross-dependence based ranking system for efficient and inefficient units in DEA

Jin-Xiao Chen,Mingrong Deng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.165

IF: 8.5

2011-01-01

Expert Systems with Applications

Abstract:Decision making units (DMUs) can be ranked using data envelopment analysis (DEA) technologies. This paper develops a new ranking system under the condition of variable returns to scale (VRS) based on a measure of cross-dependence efficiency (MCDE), where the evaluation for an efficient DMU is dependent of the efficiency changes of all inefficient units due to its absence in the reference set, while the appraisal of inefficient DMUs depends on the influence of the exclusion of each efficient unit from the reference set. The infeasibility problem that arises from the conventional super-efficiency models is eliminated. A new approach to ranking inefficient units is embedded in the proposed ranking system. Through an example, advantages of our proposal are demonstrated. A real application illustrates the effectiveness of the cross-dependence based ranking system.
Cross-Efficiency Evaluation Method with Performance Level as a Management Objective in Consideration of Bounded Rationality

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44196-024-00650-1

IF: 2.259

2024-09-18

International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems

Abstract:According to management by objectives (MBO) theory, the significance of management objectives must be considered as a reference point in a performance evaluation. Cross efficiency evaluation has always been considered to be one of the important performance evaluation methods. However, few studies to date have considered the impact of management objectives on cross efficiency. According to prospect theory, the choice of reference point will cause irrational psychology in decision makers. A management objective is a natural reference point, which will cause a 'gain and loss' psychology in enterprises and may create irrational psychology. Performance level is an important index by which to evaluate resource allocation, which in turn can be regarded as an important enterprise management objective. This paper proposes a cross efficiency evaluation method based on performance level. Cross efficiency evaluation models are constructed, based on the irrational psychology that occurs under organization objectives, personal objectives and composite objectives. This method not only considers the bounded rational behavior of enterprises, but is also more flexible. A numerical example is given to illustrate the application of the bounded rational cross efficiency evaluation method in data envelopment analysis (DEA) ranking.

computer science, artificial intelligence, interdisciplinary applications
A method to determine the integrated weights of cross-efficiency aggregation

Mei-Juan Li,Jin-Cheng Lu,Lei Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-06926-y

IF: 3.732

2022-03-21

Soft Computing

Abstract:The cross-efficiency method is an effective way to rank decision-making units (DMUs) in data envelopment analysis. The traditional approach for cross-efficiency aggregation relies on an equally weighted average that ignores their relative importance. Although many aggregation methods based on prospect theory and Shannon entropy have been proposed by scholars, there are still some drawbacks in existing cross-efficiency aggregation approaches. First, the subjective weighting method based on prospect theory cannot reflect the preference of the decision maker (DM) in a more flexible way. Second, the determination of aggregation weights only considers a single perspective that may not comprehensively reflect the decision information. To address these deficiencies, this study proposes a new method for deriving meaningful aggregation weights from subjective and objective perspectives. From a subjective perspective, prospect theory is introduced to reflect the preference of DM, and this method provides an interval of reference point that is able to select such a reference point in light of the DMs’ preferences and decision goals. The idea of variance is then used to reflect the degree of deviation between peer-evaluation efficiency and self-evaluation efficiency, and objective weights are obtained. Moreover, an optimization model is constructed to obtain integrated weights that reflect both the subjective preference of the DM and the intrinsic objective information contained in the cross-efficiency matrix. Finally, two numerical examples are examined to illustrate the effectiveness and rationality of the proposed method.

computer science, artificial intelligence, interdisciplinary applications
Hybrid game cross efficiency evaluation models based on interval data: A case of forest carbon sequestration

Yan Huang,Xiao He,Yongwu Dai,Ying-Ming Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117521

IF: 8.5

2022-10-15

Expert Systems with Applications

Abstract:Cross-efficiency evaluation is an effective method for the ranking of decision-making units (DMUs) in data envelopment analysis, which is the performed method for peer-evaluation and self-evaluation. In most cross-efficiency evaluation methods, the peer evaluation result is completely constrained by the evaluator's optimal self-evaluation weights. DMUs are connected by a competitive relationship; therefore, they can be regarded as players in the game and the cross efficiency value can be regarded as payment because of this competition. DMUs need to consider the impact of their own weights on other DMUs to identify a set of weights for evaluating themselves. Based on the idea of non-cooperative games in the cross evaluation of DMUs, this paper considers the interval cross game efficiency of DMUs with the interval data. The interval data theory is combined, the best production state and the worst production state are taken as reference states, and four evaluation strategy models are proposed according to the opposition and coordination relationship. Then, the bijective and injective interval game cross models, as well as the algorithm corresponding to the four evaluation strategies are constructed. Moreover, the result of the self-evaluation is used as the initial parameter to prove the existence of the solution and the convergence of the algorithm. Based on the priority relationship of the evaluation results under different strategies, the interval entropy method is used to aggregate the results and obtain the final cross efficiency of the interval game. Furthermore, both the applicability and superiority of this model are exemplified by an example. Finally, based on the method of this paper, the efficiency of forest carbon sequestration in China are studied, seven natural regions in China are ranked by forest carbon sequestration efficiency values reasonably, and the current regions development of forest carbon sequestration in China are evaluated.

computer science, artificial intelligence,engineering, electrical & electronic,operations research & management science
Consensus reaching for prospect cross-efficiency in data envelopment analysis with minimum adjustments

Qun Wu,Xinwang Liu,Jindong Qin,Ligang Zhou,Harish Garg,Abbas Mardani

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108087

2022-06-01

Abstract:The expected utility theory and the arithmetic average method have been widely adopted for the cross-efficiency strategy formulation and cross-efficiencies aggregation. However, traditional cross-efficiency methods often fail to consider the decision maker's (DM's) risk attitude and neglect the consensus among decision-making units (DMUs) in the cross-evaluation process. Thereby, this paper utilizes the prospect cross-efficiency (PCE) model to describe the DM's subjective preference in the evaluation process and a consensus framework to manage the consensus among DMUs in the aggregation process. First, the PCE model is utilized to derive the cross-efficiency matrix, and it can reflect DMs' psychological factors in the strategy formulation of cross-efficiency. Then, a two-stage consensus optimization framework (TSCOF) with minimum adjustments is presented to improve the consensus degree (CD) among the DMUs in the cross-evaluation process. The TSCOF generates a sequential optimization strategy that minimizes the adjustment distance and the number of modifications sequentially. Next, we develop an interactive consensus reaching process (CRP) for PCE problems based on the consensus rule. The CRP does well in helping improve the CD among DMUs. Finally, an illustrative example related to the performance of the S&T activities of 10 universities is offered to elaborate on the feasibility and effectiveness of our approach.

computer science, interdisciplinary applications,engineering, industrial
DEA Cross-Efficiency Aggregation with Deviation Degree Based on Standardized Euclidean Distance

Yan Zou,Weijie Chen,Mingyu Tong,Shuo Tao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6682499

IF: 1.43

2021-03-10

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

Abstract:Data envelopment analysis (DEA) has been extended to cross-efficiency to provide better discrimination and ranking of decision-making units (DMUs). Current researches about cross-efficiency mainly focus on the non-uniqueness of optimal solution of linear programming and information aggregation. As a common distance metric, standardized Euclidean distance is introduced to define the discrimination power between two vectors and the deviation degree for measuring the difference between the individual preference and group ideal preference. Based on above definitions, an alternative method is presented to compare multiple optimal solutions, and further, a universal weighted cross-efficiency model considering both dynamic adjustment of weights and preference formulation is constructed for evaluation and ranking. Two numerical examples are given to illustrate the effectiveness of the comparison method for multiple optimal solutions and weights determination method of DMUs, respectively. At last, a practical application aimed at evaluating environmental treatment efficiency in western area of China is given. Comparative analysis shows that our model could be more moderate, flexible, and general than some available models and methods, which can extend the theoretical research of cross-efficiency evaluation.

engineering, multidisciplinary,mathematics, interdisciplinary applications
Centralized resource allocation based on cross-evaluation considering organizational objective and individual preferences

Menghan Chen,Sheng Ang,Lijing Jiang,Feng Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-020-00579-9

2020-02-17

OR Spectrum

Abstract:Centralized resource allocation is one of important ways for a central organization to control and manage its subordinate organizations. Among various allocation methods based on data envelopment analysis (DEA), the cross-efficiency DEA-based iterative method generates allocation results using peer appraisal which considers the preference from all individual decision-making units (DMUs). However, the planned outputs target from the existing method cannot be achieved under the restrictions of current technology and productivity level. In this study, we propose a new cross-evaluation-based resource allocation approach to address the issue. Our approach not only is preferred by all individual DMUs but also always generates achievable input–output targets. Furthermore, we consider a centralized decision-making case in which an overall goal of whole organization could also be incorporated. The model is also extended to a special case of input resource allocation, namely independent procurement where funds are distributed among DMUs and DMUs use the distributed parts to raise and allocate their own input factors by themselves. Two examples are employed to illustrate our approaches.

operations research & management science
A Fuzzy Inequality Evaluation Approach for Measuring the Relative Efficiency

Xiao-Li Meng,Liu-Tang Gong,Jen-Chih Yao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/jifs-182823

2019-01-01

Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems

Abstract:Evaluating the performances of a set of entities called decision making units (DMUs) which convert multiple inputs into multiple outputs has long been considered as a difficult task because one is dealing with complex economics. This work proposes an inequality approach to evaluate the performances of DMUs. Inequalities consist of expressions of the production possibility set and the line segments joining the evaluated DMU to the positive output-axes. However, in real-world application involving performance measurement, inputs and outputs are often imprecise and fluctuated. In this case, a fuzzy inequality approach is proposed to evaluate the performances. What is more, fuzzy relative efficiency is dependent upon the number of solutions. Furthermore, the minimal element is used to distinguish the fuzzy relative efficient DMUs. Finally, two numerical examples are used to illustrate the fuzzy approach and compare the results with those obtained with alternative fuzzy approaches.
A compromise programming approach for cross efficiency measurement in basic two-stage network system

Maryam Masoumi Hazhir,Ali Asghar Foroughi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124205

IF: 8.5

2024-05-18

Expert Systems with Applications

Abstract:Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a technique that allows each decision-making unit (DMU) to calculate efficiency using the most favorable weights for inputs and outputs. The resulting efficiency scores are incomparable and difficult to discriminate. Cross-efficiency is a concept for solving the problem of incomparability among the efficiencies of a set of DMUs that are calculated from different weights and is helpful for ranking. In basic DEA, several cross-efficiency evaluation methods with various secondary purposes have been presented, however, the internal mechanism of the DMUs in cross-efficiency evaluation is often neglected. In this study, we use the composition approach for a basic two-stage structure, so that the efficiencies of the divisions are estimated first, and then the overall efficiency of the system is obtained. To solve the linear bi-objective model in the combination approach, we consider a compromise programming problem to find the solution that is as close as possible to the ideal point. Finally, a secondary objective model is proposed to select a weight among the optimal weights of the compromise model, which also guarantees the efficiency of the optimal weight for the bi-objective problem. We use the optimal solution obtained from this model to evaluate cross-efficiency and rank DMUs for a series two-stage system. The proposed approach enables us to rank the DMUs by assessing the performance of each DMU and each of its separate divisions. The validity of the suggested network cross-efficiency evaluation is demonstrated by a numerical example from the literature.

computer science, artificial intelligence,engineering, electrical & electronic,operations research & management science
Relative uniqueness or uniqueness? A new cross-efficiency evaluation approach with weight priority strategy

Lei Chen,Ying-Ming Wang,Junchao Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124248

IF: 8.5

2024-05-20

Expert Systems with Applications

Abstract:Due to a large number of studies on cross-evaluation strategies, the theoretical problem of DEA cross-efficiency approach has been transformed from the non-uniqueness of the optimal solution to the relative uniqueness, because the existing cross-evaluation strategies can only reduce the possibility of non-unique solutions, but cannot prove the existence of a unique optimal solution. This paper illustrates the relative uniqueness of optimal solution of the cross-efficiency approach with traditional cross-evaluation strategies, and the graphic method and theoretical analysis are used to explain the reasons of relative uniqueness. Based on the data characteristic of inputs and outputs, the weight priority rule is made for constructing the new cross-evaluation strategy, and its optimal solution is proved to be unique. In addition, the weight priority strategy can also be introduced into traditional strategies as a supplementary strategy, and then the unique optimal solution can be obtained on the premise of preserving the characteristics of traditional strategies. In general, this paper solves the non-uniqueness and relative uniqueness problem of optimal solution in the DEA cross-efficiency approach, and then the reliability and robustness of the approach are thus improved.

computer science, artificial intelligence,engineering, electrical & electronic,operations research & management science
DEA cross-efficiency models with prospect theory and distance entropy: An empirical study on high-tech industries

Xiaoqing Chen,Xinwang Liu,Qingyuan Zhu,Zhiwei Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122941

IF: 8.5

2023-12-29

Expert Systems with Applications

Abstract:Cross-efficiency evaluation with the data envelopment analysis (DEA) model is an effective way to assess performance and provide a complete ranking of decision-making units. However, it is generally assumed that decision makers are perfectly rational in the cross-efficiency model, which fails to consider the subjective preferences of decision-makers. Moreover, the arithmetic average method is usually adopted to aggregate efficiency scores in traditional cross-efficiency methods, which underestimates the importance of self-evaluation. To address these issues, we extend cross-efficiency with the DEA model by incorporating prospect theory and the distance entropy function. First, we calculate the prospect values of decision-making units to describe the non-rational subjective preferences under the risk of decision-makers. Second, based on prospect cross-efficiency, a new distance entropy function is developed to aggregate the ultimate prospect cross-efficiency values. More specifically, some traditional cross-efficiency evaluation models can be considered special cases of prospect cross-efficiency models with appropriate adjustments to the parameters. Finally, an empirical example is used to evaluate the prospect cross-efficiency results with the high-tech industries of 29 provinces in China to illustrate the applicability and effectiveness of the proposed model in ranking observations.

computer science, artificial intelligence,engineering, electrical & electronic,operations research & management science
A cross-efficiency model using bargaining theory in a two-stage network DEA

Fariba Najafzade,Sahar Khoshfetrat,Shahram Saeidi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-022-02027-6

2022-10-02

Computational and Applied Mathematics

Abstract:Fundamental data envelopment analysis (DEA) models fail to compare and correctly rank decision-making units (DMUs) because of the self-evaluation nature and flexibility in selecting desired optimal weights. The problem is exacerbated for network DMUs, including the ranking of stages. Cross-efficiency is a promising alternative to solve this problem. In addition to evaluating the efficiency of each DMU with the optimal weights obtained from self-evaluation, cross-efficiency also evaluates with the optimal weights selected by its peers. In previous researches, achieving efficiency from self-evaluation is considered, but this subject has attracted less attention in bargaining. To fill this gap, in this paper, a bargaining model named two stages C–B model as a secondary objective to select the favorite optimal weight between the optimal weights in evaluating the overall efficiency of each DMU and a unique cross-efficiency is obtained. For this purpose, non-linear programming is presented. Finally, this enables us to rank DMUs uniquely while assessing the performance of each DMU and its various divisions.

mathematics, applied

Cross-efficiency evaluation based on ideal and anti-ideal decision making units

Improved DEA Cross Efficiency Evaluation Method Based on Ideal and Anti-Ideal Points

A Cross-Efficiency Evaluation Method Based on Evaluation Criteria Balanced on Interval Weights

A new cross-efficiency ranking method in group decision making environment

A neutral cross-efficiency evaluation method based on interval reference points in consideration of bounded rational behavior

Cross‐efficiency evaluation method based on the conservative point of view

Cross-efficiency Evaluation in Data Envelopment Analysis Based on Prospect Theory

Improving the evaluation of cross efficiencies: A method based on Shannon entropy weight

Algorithms for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making and Efficiency Analysis Problems

A cross-dependence based ranking system for efficient and inefficient units in DEA

Cross-Efficiency Evaluation Method with Performance Level as a Management Objective in Consideration of Bounded Rationality

A method to determine the integrated weights of cross-efficiency aggregation

Hybrid game cross efficiency evaluation models based on interval data: A case of forest carbon sequestration

Consensus reaching for prospect cross-efficiency in data envelopment analysis with minimum adjustments

DEA Cross-Efficiency Aggregation with Deviation Degree Based on Standardized Euclidean Distance

Centralized resource allocation based on cross-evaluation considering organizational objective and individual preferences

A Fuzzy Inequality Evaluation Approach for Measuring the Relative Efficiency

A compromise programming approach for cross efficiency measurement in basic two-stage network system

Relative uniqueness or uniqueness? A new cross-efficiency evaluation approach with weight priority strategy

DEA cross-efficiency models with prospect theory and distance entropy: An empirical study on high-tech industries

A cross-efficiency model using bargaining theory in a two-stage network DEA