Abstract:Abstract Oil and gas pipeline failure and leakage can seriously damage people's lives and the ecosystem. The prediction of failure pressure for pipelines with damage is one of the most important and challenging tasks faced by industry, which affects the assessment of pipeline safety. Previous studies widely used industrial models or the finite element (FE) method to predict the failure pressure. However, the industrial models may give limited information, and the FE method has much heavy computation burden. In this work, three machine learning models - artificial neural network (ANN), XGBoost (XGB) and CatBoost (CAT) are developed for forecasting the failure pressure of pipelines with defects. Firstly, the simulation results of the FE method are validated by real failure pressure and compared with the calculation results of industrial models (ASME-B31G and DNV). Then 180 pipeline samples including pipeline attributes and defect sizes collected from real in-line inspection data in a pipeline company and the corresponding FE simulation results of failure pressure of these 180 defective pipelines are used for the training and testing of the machine learning models. The results show that the simulation accuracy of the FE method is higher than the calculation accuracy of the industrial models, and the FE simulation results are suitable to be the outputs of machine learning models. The three machine learning methods all provide satisfactory prediction accuracy in failure pressure. Specifically, CAT is the best machine learning method in this study for its lowest relative error (3.11% on average), mean absolute error (0.53), root mean square error (0.78) and highest coefficient of determination (R2) up to 98% in testing. Moreover, the machine learning models present better performance on average relative errors compared to the industrial models. CAT shows higher accuracy than the industrial models and FE simulation on minimum and average relative errors. Finally, the prediction result of CAT is used to discuss the effect of input features on failure pressure of pipelines, which demonstrates that the importance of features follows the order of pipeline thickness > pipeline outside diameter > defect depth > defect length > defect width. Once the above machine learning methods are used in industry, more and more real data will be collected to train a model and make it more accurate. In this way, these methods will provide an efficient way to evaluate the safety of defective pipelines. In addition, the failure pressure of pipeline could be estimated to help operators figure out a pipeline condition and further prioritize the pipelines for maintenance.

Development of a Novel Approach for Strain Demand Prediction of Pipes at Fault Crossings on the Basis of Multi-Layer Neural Network Driven by Strain Data

A Simplified Analytical Solution of Pipeline Response under Normal Faulting

Using Finite Element Method for Stress-Strain Evaluation of Commonly Used Buried Pipelines in Fault

Probabilistic Analysis of Pipelines in Geohazard Zones Using a Novel Approach for Strain Calculation

A novel empirical model for peak strain prediction of pipelines under circular landslides

A new analytical method for calculating the strain of oil and gas pipeline under a normal fault dislocation

Response of Pipelines under Fault Crossing

An ANN‐based failure pressure prediction method for buried high‐strength pipes with stray current corrosion defect

Failure Risk Prediction Model for Girth Welds in High-Strength Steel Pipeline Based on Historical Data and Artificial Neural Network

Reliability evaluation method for pipes buried in fault areas based on the probabilistic fault displacement hazard analysis

Sensitivity analysis and failure prediction of X80 pipeline under transverse landslide

Overall Framework Of Strain-Based Design And Assessment Of Pipelines

Experimental and Numerical Studies on Mechanical Behavior of Buried Pipelines Crossing Faults

Numerical Simulation and ANN Prediction of Crack Problems within Corrosion Defects

The application of strain-based design to pipelines and the requirements on pipe materials

Application Of Compressive Strain Capacity Models To Multiple Grades Of Pipelines

Artificial Neural Network-Based Failure Pressure Prediction of API 5L X80 Pipeline with Circumferentially Aligned Interacting Corrosion Defects Subjected to Combined Loadings

Failure Pressure Prediction of Defective Pipeline Using Finite Element Method and Machine Learning Models

Modelling and Analysing Failure Modes of Buried Pipelines Perpendicularly Crossing Landslide Boundaries

Quantitative research on stress failure risk assessment for girth welds with unequal wall thickness of the X80 pipeline under lateral load

Mechanical Behavior of Submarine Pipelines under Active Strike-Slip Fault Movement