TMRC 2016│Schedule at a glance
James D. KIELY,Paul M. JONES,Y. YANG,Manuel,ANAYA-DUFRESNE,Patrick C. FLETCHER,C. John,DUDA,Michael T. JOHNSON,Neeraj,DWIVEDI,Anna K. OTT,Reuben J. YEO,Chunmeng DOU,Ugo SASSI,DE Domenico,FAZIO,A. C. FERRARI,C. S. BHATIA,Nguyen Thi Van ANH,Ryoichi,NAKATANI,Yoshinori KOTANI,Tetsuya,NAKAMURA,K. H. CAO,S. Z. PENG,X. M.,WANG,X. X. ZHAO,J. Q. ZHOU,X. Y. LIN,H. Z.,W. S. ZHAO,J. J. KAN,C. CHING,J. AHN,L.,XUE,R. WANG,A. KONTOS,S. LIANG,M. BANGAR,H. CHEN,S. HASSAN,S. KIM,M. PAKALA,H. S.,KANG
2016-01-01
Abstract:With the recent 1.0[1] and 1.5[2,5] Tb/inch basic technology demonstration, and drive level demonstration [3,4] Heat-Assisted Magnetic Recording (HAMR) [5] has proven to be a viable and promising technology for future magnetic data-storage products. The commercialization of HAMR presents some significant technical challenges that need to be resolved before the widespread adoption of the technology can begin. The recent demonstrations illustrate high track density performance for this new technology compared to conventional Perpendicular Magnetic Recording (PMR). Figure 1:Micromagnetic modeling for the HAMR (upper) and PMR (lower) write process using a 128-bit pseudo random sequence at 2000 kilo-flux changes per inch (KFCI). Only a subset of the pattern is shown. The upper and lower images use different color schemes, attached at the right, to indicate the level of saturation in the perpendicular direction. Differences in the areal density capability limits for HAMR and PMR are explored using spinstand measurements, drive footprinting and micromagnetic modeling. The written track curvature is measured with a special technique that mitigates cross-track averaging effects due to finite read sensor width. Tracks written with HAMR heads are shown to have more curvature compared to those written with modern PMR writers. Mitigation of written track curvature is demonstrated with two different HAMR writer designs. The curvature effect appears to challenge not only the downtrack bit resolution during readback, but also the cross-track written width with increased linear density (Fig 2). Experimental measurements of constant bit error rate for different linear and track densities indicate a significant opportunity for high track density recording using HAMR (Fig 3). The difference appears to be related to the ability for HAMR to address high track pitches with a minimal increase in risk of adjacent track interference compared to PMR. HAMR