Risk Factors Related to Superior Facet Joint Violation During Lumbar Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF)

Yiwei Zhao,Suomao Yuan,Yonghao Tian,Xinyu Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.04.118
IF: 2.21
2020-01-01
World Neurosurgery
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence of superior facet joint violation (FJV) during percutaneous pedicle screw placement in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, and assess the possible risk factors for FJV. METHODS: An analysis of 91 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases treated with percutaneous pedicle screw placement via minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion from 2012 to 2018 was performed. Superior FJV was evaluated and graded by 3-dimensional lumbar computed tomography reconstruction. Analysis of possible risk factors included general condition of patients, anatomical characteristics of facet joint (FJ; axial, sagittal, and coronal diameters of FJ, facet angle, lumbar lordosis angle, lumbar lordosis index, and depth of lamina), and surgical factors (pedicle screw angle, screw-superior FJ distance, cranial angle, proximal rod length, and rod contouring). RESULTS: The overall violation rate of superior FJ was 34.07% (62/182), and high-grade violation rate was 16.06% (27/182). The logistic regression analysis revealed that body mass index >= 30 kg/m(2) and pedicle screw placement at L5 were independent risk factors of FJV. Anatomical factors showed that the incidence of FJV was significantly increased when axial, sagittal, and coronal diameters of FJ were all >= 12 mm or FA was >= 40 degrees. Surgical factors showed that the FJV group had a smaller pedicle screw angle and screw-superior FJ distance compared with the non-FJV group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Body mass index >= 30 kg/m(2) and pedicle screw placement at L5 were independent risk factors of superior FJV. FJV was more likely to occur in hypertrophic FJ (axial, sagittal, and coronal diameters >= 12 mm) or coronal orientation (FA >= 40 degrees).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?