Abstract:Objective: The mainstream lumbar fusion surgeries have various shortcomings, such as complex operation, much invasion, and loss of lumbar function. How to minimize the surgical injury and to achieve better therapeutic effects has become the goal pursued by spine surgeons. This study introduces a cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw fixation combined with facet fusion (FF), evaluates its safety and efficacy, and explores its advantages, in order to provide a reference for treatment of patients with single-level lumbar stenosis or grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical, radiological, and operative data of 167 patients with single-level lumbar stenosis or grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent FF or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) from January 2013 to September 2019 in the spine surgery department of the Second Hospital of Shandong University. Patients were divided into four groups according to surgical method: group CBT-FF, CBT screw combined with FF; group PS-FF, pedicle screw (PS) combined with FF; group CBT-TLIF, CBT screw combined with TLIF; and group PS-TLIF, PS combined with TLIF. The operation time, estimated intraoperative blood loss, complications after surgery, visual analog scale (VAS), and Oswestry disability index (ODI) of the four groups were compared. The fusion was evaluated by anteroposterior and lateral X-ray, CT scan, and three-dimensional reconstruction. Results: Twelve months after surgery, the fusion rate of four groups had no significantly statistical differences (p = 0.914). VAS and ODI scores were lower after surgery than before. Low back pain VAS scores 1 week after surgery in group CBT-FF and group CBT-TLIF were significantly lower than those in group PS-FF and group PS-TLIF (pCF/PF = 0.001, pCF/PT = 0.000, pPF/CT = 0.049, pCT/PT = 0.000). Low back pain VAS score 3 months after surgery was significantly lower in group CBT-FF than group PS-FF and group PS-TLIF (pCF/PF = 0.045, pCF/PT = 0.008). ODI score 1 week after surgery was significantly lower in group CBT-FF than group PS-FF, group CBT-TLIF, and group PS-TLIF (pCF/PF = 0.000, pCF/CT = 0.005, pCF/PT = 0.000, pCT/PT = 0.015). ODI score 3 months after surgery was significantly lower in group CBT-FF than group PS-FF, group CBT-TLIF, and group PS-TLIF (pCF/PF = 0.001, pCF/CT = 0.002, pCF/PT = 0.000). Incidence of complications did not significantly differ among the groups. Conclusion: CBT screw fixation combined with FF is a safe and efficacious procedure for patients with single-level lumbar stenosis or grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis. This minimally invasive approach of lumbar fusion can be simply and easily performed. Patients who undergo CBT screw fixation combined with FF recovered faster than TLIF.

The Rates and Risk Factors of Intra-Pedicular Accuracy and Proximal Facet Joint Violation for Single-Level Degenerative Lumbar Diseases

Correlation Study Between Facet Angle and Facet Violation in Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement in Lumbar Vertebrae

Facet Angle and Its Importance on Joint Violation in Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation in Lumbar Vertebrae

Risk Factors Related to Superior Facet Joint Violation During Lumbar Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF)

Safety and Efficacy of Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Fixation Combined with Facet Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease

Retrospective study on the CT evaluation of accuracy of pedicle screw placement in posterior lumbosacral instrumentation

[Influencing Factors of Adjacent Superior Segment Facet Joint Violation after Transpedicular Screw Instrumentation During Transforanal Lumbar Interbody Fusion].

Early Clinical Outcome of Lumbar Spinal Fixation With Cortical Bone Trajectory Pedicle Screws in Patients With Osteoporosis With Degenerative Disease.

The accuracy of cortical bone trajectory screw placement guided by spinous process clamp hardware in lumbar spinal surgery: a retrospective study

Comparison of Effectiveness of Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Fixation and Pedicle Screw Fixation in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Robot-Assisted Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Pedicle Screw Placement in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease.

Superior Facet Joint Violations During Single Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Preliminary Retrospective Clinical Study

Cortical Trajectory versus Traditional Pedicle Screw Trajectory in Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis of Complications and Clinical Outcomes

Comparison of Superior‐Level Facet Joint Violations Between Robot‐Assisted Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement and Conventional Open Fluoroscopic‐Guided Pedicle Screw Placement

Proximity Between Screw and Endplate of Upper Instrumented Vertebra Using a Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw can Increase Radiographic Adjacent Segment Degeneration Risks in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Accuracy of Robot-Assisted Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement for Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Comparative Cohort Study

Multivariate Analysis of Pedicle Screw Invasion of the Proximal Facet Joint after Lumbar Surgery

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screws versus traditional pedicle screws fixation: a study protocol of randomised controlled trial

Incidences and Risk factors of Screw-related Superior Facet Articular Surface Violation at L4 and L5 levels in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Superior-segment Bilateral Facet Violation in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation, Part I

Expert consensus on the clinical application of cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws: results from a modified Delphi study