Abstract:Dry reforming of methane (DRM) reaction provides a novel direction for fossil raw materials through a superior ratio of hydrogen and carbon monoxide. The evaluation of NiCo catalysts mightily depends on the raw materials and processes for preparation. Here, we briefly look at the correlation between the component properties and catalytic performances, the effect of preparation methods, and the mechanism of NiCo catalysts. Active components like metals ratio and the formation of alloy have an important influence on the close connection between metals. The support properties are exhibited with different situations, including physical and chemical mutual effect. Acid-base property, redox property and metal-support interaction play an important role in the chemical interaction of catalysts. However, the deactivation due to the carbon deposition and bimetallic sintering still remains a large challenge for the deployment of NiCo catalysts. The promoters have been reported especially help with these disadvantages of pure bimetallic catalysts. They are conducive to more stable activation and dispersion of metals. In addition to the above, we then move on to consider numerous preparation methods incorporating the conventional and special ones to explore the efficacy of preparing technology. The last section describes the reaction mechanisms of catalyst surface, inside with density functional theory, micro-kinetic modeling and in-situ representation. These five parts have significant implications for mass production that optimize DRM reaction yields and simultaneously saving cost. In this paper, we present a critical assessment for the relevant development and remaining limitations of NiCo bimetallic catalysts. It is hoped to not only shed light upon the development of high-performance industrial DRM catalysts, but also contribute an innovative perspective to understand anti-coking mechanism and even producing syngas.

CO2 reforming of CH4 to syngas over nickel-based catalysts

Recent advances in promoting dry reforming of methane of Nickel-based catalysts

Recent Advances in Ni-Based Catalysts for CH4-CO2 Reforming (2013–2023)

Research Progress of Carbon Deposition on Ni-Based Catalyst for CO2-CH4 Reforming

Recent Advances in Coke Management for Dry Reforming of Methane over Ni-Based Catalysts

Unbounding the Future: Designing NiAl‐based Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane

Recent advances in dry reforming of methane over Ni-based catalysts

Optimization of Ni-Based Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane via Alloy Design: A Review

Progress in Ni-based catalysts for CH4-CO2 reforming reaction

Smart Designs of Anti-Coking and Anti-Sintering Ni-Based Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane: A Recent Review

Remarkable Basic-Metal Oxides Promoted Confinement Catalysts for CO2 Reforming

Nickel Catalyst with Atomically-Thin Meshed Cobalt Coating for Improved Durability in Dry Reforming of Methane

Bimetallic Nickel-Cobalt catalysts and their application in dry reforming reaction of methane

Carbon Dioxide Reforming of Methane over Ni-based Catalyst

Research Progress of Ni-based Composite Catalysts for Methane Dry Reforming

The effect of interfacial engineering on the deactivation resistance of nickel-based catalysts for dry reforming of methane

Small-sized Ni nanoparticles embedded nickel phyllosilicate as a metal-acid bifunctional zeolite catalyst for cooperatively boosting CO2-CH4 reforming

Recent Progresses in the Design and Fabrication of Highly Efficient Ni-Based Catalysts With Advanced Catalytic Activity and Enhanced Anti-coke Performance Toward CO<sub>2</sub>Reforming of Methane

Recent Progresses in the Design and Fabrication of Highly Efficient Ni-Based Catalysts With Advanced Catalytic Activity and Enhanced Anti-coke Performance Toward CO2 Reforming of Methane

Dry reforming of methane for syngas production over attapulgite-derived MFI zeolite encapsulated bimetallic Ni-Co catalysts

Dry reforming of methane over silica zeolite-encapsulated Ni-based catalysts: Effect of preparation method, support structure and Ni content on catalytic performance