Abstract:Objective The widely use of ultrasound elastography has increased the detection rate of breast cancer.It has great advantage of differential diagnosis of breast tumor.Our study is to evaluate and compare the value of the quantitative ultrasound elastography parameters of AR ( area ratio) , ESR ( entire strain ratio) , LSR ( locolized strain ratio) , EFLR( entire fat to lesion ratio) and LFLR( locolized fat to lesion ratio) in the differential diagnosis of breast tumor. Methods 110 patients with 113 breast tumors were collected from Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Region between January 2015 and January 2016 who underwent breast exami-nation.The tumors were divided into two groups according to patholo-gy which acts as gold standard:benign group with 59 lesions and ma-lignant group with 54 lesions.Participants underwent quantitative ul-trasound elastography parameters examination.AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR、LFLR were compared between benign group and malignant group and ROC curve was drawn.Conventional ultrasound and ultrasound elastography parameter are combined to differentiate the benign or malignant lesion.Calculate the various parameters on the accuracy、susceptibility、specificity、positive likelihood ratio、negative likeli-hood ratio of the diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions, and determine the quantitative parameter with the highest accuracy. Results The mean value of AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR and LFLR of malignant lesions were all significantly greater than that of benign le-sions (P=0.000).Compared with the conventional ultrasound, AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR and LFLR have higher AUC in the differentia-tion of benign and malignant breast lesions;AUC of AR and ESR are higher than conventional ultrasound、LSR、EFLR and LFLR( P<0.000).Compared with conventional ultrasound(1.523) alone, conventional ultrasound combined separately with AR、ESR、EFLR and LFLR have higher positive likelihood ratio(11.581、8.272、3.482、2.458、2.100) in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions, so as accuracy、susceptibility、specificity(P<0.000).The AUC of conventional ultrasound combined separately with AR and ESR[0.940(0.890~0.990)、0.941(0.891~0.990)] were higher than conventional ultrasound and conventional ultrasound com-bined separately with LSR、EFLR、LFLR[0.669(0.669~0.768)、0.837(0.759~0.915)、0.763(0.673~0.852)、0.787(0.701~0.874)],so as accuracy、susceptibility、specificity and positive likelihood ratio(P<0.000). Conclusion Quantitative ultrasound elastography may be helpful in differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions, especially combining conventional ultrasound with AR and ESR, which were superior to combining with the other parameters and provide a more objective and credible basis to differenti-ate benign and malignant breast tumors with conventional ultrasound.

The Clinical Value of Arrival-time Parametric Imaging Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions

Value of Scoring by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Combined with Ultrasonic Elastography in Differential Diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 Lesions

The qualitative and quantitative features of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in biomarker expression of breast cancer

The Value of Automated Breast Volume Scanning, Combined with Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging Quantification in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesion

PREDICTION OF PROSTATE BIOPSY OUTCOME BY MULTIPARAMETRIC ULTRASOUND IMAGING

The Application Value of Using Semiquantitative and Quantitative Parameters in Multimodal Ultrasound to Distinguish Between Benign and Malignant BI-RADS 4 Lesions

The Differential Diagnostic Value of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography in BI-RADSUS 4B Breast Lesions

Correlation Analysis between Expression Profiles of Molecular Markers and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Parameters in Breast Cancer

Ultrasound super-resolution imaging for differential diagnosis of breast masses

Can different regions of interest influence the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions using quantitative parameters of contrast-enhanced sonography?

The differentiation of malignant and benign lesions of the breast by quantitative Ultrasound elastography

Differentiation of Atypical Hepatic Hemangioma from Liver Metastases: Diagnostic Performance of a Novel Type of Color Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound.

Spatiotemporal analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differentiating between malignant and benign breast lesions

The value of ultrasound elastography combined with multi-parameters in the diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 breast lesions

Combined Use of Shear Wave Elastography, Microvascular Doppler Ultrasound Technique, and BI-RADS for the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses

Dual-energy CT quantitative parameters for the differentiation of benign from malignant lesions and the prediction of histopathological and molecular subtypes in breast cancer

Value of Contrast-Enhanced Microflow Imaging in Diagnosis of Breast Masses in Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

Quantitative analysis from ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI using population-based versus individual arterial input functions, and comparison with semi-quantitative analysis

Quantitative Analysis of the Time–Intensity Curve of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of the Liver: Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Liver Lesions

Added Value of a New Strain Elastography Technique in Conventional Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Breast Masses: A Prospective Multicenter Study

Clinical value of quantitative analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant pelvic tumors