Abstract:Objective: To examine the early outcome of valve sparing aortic root replacement with reimplantation technique (David procedure) with partial upper sternotomy. Methods: From April 2016 to April 2020, 31 patients underwent valve sparing aortic root replacement under partial upper sternotomy at Vascular Surgery Center, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College. There were 28 males and 3 females, aging (44±13) years (range: 11 to 65 years). Preoperative aortic regurgitation was found greater than moderate in 15 patients, moderate in 6 patients and less than moderate in 10 patients. The diameter of aortic annulus was (26±3) mm (range: 21 to 34 mm), the diameter of aortic sinus was (51±6) mm (range: 41 to 68 mm), the diameter of ascending aorta was (43±8) mm (range: 26 to 62 mm). The preoperative ejection fraction was (65±4) % (range: 59% to 72%) and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter was (55±6) mm (range: 42 to 68 mm). All cases were treated with David Ⅰ procedure, including simple David procedure in 26 patients, David+ascending aorta and partial aortic arch replacement in 3 patients, David+thoracic endovascular aortic repair in 1 patient, David+stent elephant trunk implantation in 1 patient. Results: The operation time, cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamping time were (330±58) minutes (range: 214 to 481 minutes), (138±23) minutes (range: 106 to 192 minutes) and (108±17) minutes (range: 82 to 154 minutes), respectively. There were no death and serious complications (stroke, myocardial infarction, renal insufficiency, severe infection, etc.). The postoperative drainage volume within 24 hours was (314±145) ml (range: 130 to 830 ml). The intubation time was (14±3) hours (range: 8 to 21 hours), and the ICU time was (M(QR)) 2.1(1.5) days (range: 1.0 to 5.0 days). Eight patients had no blood transfusion, the proportion of red blood cell use was 9.7% (3/31), plasma use was 22.6% (7/31), and platelet use was 71.0% (22/31). The postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction was (62±4)% (range: 54% to 69%), and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter was (48±4) mm (range: 39 to 56 mm). After operation, aortic regurgitation was significantly improved, with no more than moderate regurgitation, small to moderate regurgitation in 3 patients, minor regurgitation in 3 patients, micro regurgitation in 12 patients and no regurgitation in 13 patients. The follow-up period was 3.5(6.1) months (range: 2.0 to 39.0 months). Echocardiographic follow-up data were obtained in 26 cases, including moderate regurgitation in 1 patient, small to moderate regurgitation in 9 patients, minor regurgitation in 5 patients, micro regurgitation in 6 patients and no regurgitation in 5 patients. There were no major adverse cardiovascular events and aortic events during the follow-up period. No patient was reoperated for aortic regurgitation. Conclusion: Valve sparing aortic root replacement under partial upper sternotomy is safe and feasible, and the early result is satisfactory.

[Comparison of anterolateral minithoracotomy versus partial upper hemisternotomy in aortic valve replacement].

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Postoperative Recovery Between Two Open Heart Surgeries:Minimally Invasive Right Subaxillary Vertical Thoracomy and Traditional Median Sternotomy

The Analysis of Anterolateral Minithoracotomy Versus Partial Upper Hemisternotomy in Minimally Invasive Dual Mitral and Aortic Valve Replacement

Comparative efficacy of totally thoracoscopic, mini-thoracotomy, and mini-sternotomy approaches in aortic valve replacement

Clinical Effect of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy Approach Aortic Valve Replacement

Combined Mitral And Aortic Valve Procedure Via Right Mini-Thoracotomy Versus Full Median Sternotomy Insights From A Single-Center Study Of Propensity-Matched Data

Right Anterolateral Thoracotomy: an Attractive Alternative to Repeat Sternotomy for High-Risk Patients Undergoing Reoperative Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Surgery.

[Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement for Isolated Aortic Valve Disease: Clinical Analysis of 101 Consecutive Patients].

Right Anterior Minithoracotomy Approach for Aortic Valve Replacement

A propensity score matched study of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through right anterior minithoracotomy

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through a right anterior thoracotomy

The Comparative Study of Right Anterolateral Minithoracotomy and Median Sternotomy in the Mitral Valve Replacement

Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery Via Right Minithoracotomy

Comparison of right axillary straight incision and median sternotomy in mitral valve replacement

Partial versus Complete Sternotomy for Aortic Valve Replacement—Multicenter Study

Right Mini-Thoracotomy for Aortic Plus Mitral with or without Tricuspid Valve Surgery

One Incision, Two Cannulations for Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Surgery.

Early Results Of Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement Via Partial Sternotomy Or Right Thoracotomy: Insights In Acute Kidney Injury

Safety and Efficacy of Two-Port Thoracoscopic Aortic Valve Replacement

[Early outcome of valve sparing aortic root replacement with partial upper sternotomy]

Minithoracotomy vs. Conventional Mitral Valve Surgery for Rheumatic Mitral Valve Stenosis: a Single-Center Analysis of 128 Patients