Abstract:Background The benefits of minimally invasive techniques in cardiac surgery remain poorly defined. We evaluated the short- and mid-term outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement through partial upper versus complete median sternotomy (MS) in a large, German multicenter cohort. Methods A total of 2,929 patients underwent isolated surgical aortic valve replacement via partial upper sternotomy (PUS, n = 1,764) or MS ( n = 1,165) at nine participating heart centers between 2016 and 2020. After propensity-score matching, 1,990 patients were eligible for analysis. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke at 30 days and in follow-up, up to 5 years. Secondary end points were acute kidney injury, length of hospital stay, transfusions, deep sternal wound infection, Dressler's syndrome, rehospitalization, and conversion to sternotomy. Results Unadjusted MACCE rates were significantly lower in the PUS group both at 30 days ( p = 0.02) and in 5-year follow-up ( p = 0.01). However, after propensity-score matching, differences between the groups were no more statistically significant: MACCE rates were 3.9% (PUS) versus 5.4% (MS, p = 0.14) at 30 days, and 9.9 versus 11.3% in 5-year follow-up ( p = 0.36). In the minimally invasive group, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay was shorter ( p = 0.03), Dressler's syndrome occurred less frequently ( p = 0.006), and the rate of rehospitalization was reduced significantly ( p < 0.001). There were 3.8% conversions to full sternotomy. Conclusion In a large, German multicenter cohort, MACCE rates were comparable in surgical aortic valve replacement through partial upper and complete sternotomies. Shorter ICU stay and lower rates of Dressler's syndrome and rehospitalization were in favor of the partial sternotomy group. The study results were presented at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the German Society for Thoracic, Cardiac, and Vascular Surgery (DGTHG) in Hamburg, Germany, February 11–14, 2023. The abstract has been awarded the Hans Georg Borst Award for highest ranking in the review process. Conception and design of the study were performed by N.G., F.S., R.F., H.D., H.H., P.M., M.S., T.F., D.F., and U.F. Acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data by N.G., T.S., F.P., K.H., H.J., J.S., C.S., T.Z., Y.E., and S.H. Drafting the manuscript by N.G., T.S., F.P., K.H., H.H., P.M., and U.F. Critical revision of the manuscript by H.J., J.S., C.S., T.Z., Y.E., F.S., R.F., H.D., M.S., S.H., T.F., and D.F. All authors approved the final manuscript version to be published. All authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. Received: 22 November 2023 Accepted: 27 February 2024 Article published online: 16 April 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Right Mini-Thoracotomy for Aortic Plus Mitral with or without Tricuspid Valve Surgery

Combined Mitral And Aortic Valve Procedure Via Right Mini-Thoracotomy Versus Full Median Sternotomy Insights From A Single-Center Study Of Propensity-Matched Data

Long-term outcomes of minimally invasive concomitant mitral and tricuspid valve surgery with surgical ablation

Right Anterolateral Thoracotomy: an Attractive Alternative to Repeat Sternotomy for High-Risk Patients Undergoing Reoperative Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Surgery.

Minithoracotomy vs. Conventional Mitral Valve Surgery for Rheumatic Mitral Valve Stenosis: a Single-Center Analysis of 128 Patients

Pushing boundaries in cardiac surgery: minimally invasive mitral valve repair combined with tricuspid valve repair and/or other concomitant procedures

Right mini-thoracotomy for concomitant aortic valve replacement and right coronary artery bypass graft

Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery Via Right Minithoracotomy

Right Anterolateral Minithoracotomy with Intact Thorax for Cardiac Multivalvular Disease

A propensity matched comparison of robotic vs. traditional minimal access approach for mitral valve repair with concomitant cryoablation

Surgical repair of mitral valve prolapse through a minimal right vertical infraaxillary thoracotomy.

Minimally invasive direct access mitral valve surgery

Benefits Of A Right Anterolateral Minithoracotomy Rather Than A Median Sternotomy In Isolated Tricuspid Redo Procedures

Feasibility, safety, and short-term outcome of totally thoracoscopic mitral valve procedure

Long-term Outcomes of a Totally Thoracoscopic Approach for Reoperative Mitral Valve Replacement: a Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

The right vertical infra-axillary incision for mitral valve replacement

Partial versus Complete Sternotomy for Aortic Valve Replacement—Multicenter Study

Early and Mid-Term Outcomes of Isolate Mitral Valve Repair Through Minimal Invasive Versus Median Sternotomy Ap-Proach: a Propensity-Matched Analysis

Early and mid-term outcomes of minimally invasive mitral valve repair via right mini-thoracotomy: 5-year experience with 129 consecutive patients

Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Replacement Is A Safe And Effective Surgery For Patients With Rheumatic Valve Disease A Retrospective Study

Early and late Results after Surgical Mitral Valve Repair: A High-Volume Center Experience