Computational framework for identifying and evaluating mutagenic and xenoestrogenic potential of food additives

Shweta Singh Chauhan,Prekshi Garg,Ramakrishnan Parthasarathi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134233
IF: 13.6
2024-04-12
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Abstract:Food additives are chemicals incorporated in food to enhance its flavor, color and prevent spoilage. Some of these are associated with substantial health hazards, including developmental disorders, increase cancer risk, and hormone disruption. Hence, this study aimed to comprehend the in-silico toxicology framework for evaluating mutagenic and xenoestrogenic potential of food additives and their association with breast cancer. A total of 2885 food additives were screened for toxicity based on Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC), mutagenicity endpoint prediction, and mutagenic structural alerts/toxicophores identification. Ten food additives were identified as having mutagenic potential based on toxicity screening. Furthermore, Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) analysis identified ESR1, as a key hub gene in breast cancer. KEGG pathway analysis verified that ESR1 plays a significant role in breast cancer pathogenesis. Additionally, competitive interaction studies of the predicted potential mutagenic food additives with the estrogen receptor-α were evaluated at agonist and antagonist binding sites. Indole, Dichloromethane, Trichloroethylene, Quinoline, 6-methyl quinoline, Ethyl nitrite, and 4-methyl quinoline could act as agonists, and Paraldehyde, Azodicarbonamide, and 2-acetylfuranmay as antagonists. The systematic risk assessment framework reported in this study enables the exploration of mutagenic and xenoestrogenic potential associated with food additives for hazard identification and management.
environmental sciences,engineering, environmental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?